↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 2,687)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
931 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1783 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice
Published in
BioScience, November 2017
DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix125
Authors

William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Mauro Galetti, Mohammed Alamgir, Eileen Crist, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud, William F. Laurance, 364 scientist signatories from 184 countries 15

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,544 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,783 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1783 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 306 17%
Researcher 301 17%
Student > Master 260 15%
Student > Bachelor 177 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 87 5%
Other 301 17%
Unknown 351 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 425 24%
Environmental Science 351 20%
Social Sciences 104 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 65 4%
Engineering 64 4%
Other 318 18%
Unknown 456 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7942. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2024.
All research outputs
#319
of 26,792,687 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#3
of 2,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 341,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,792,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.