Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 103: Line 103:
==== Алиса Селезньова, StanProg @bgwikisource ====
==== Алиса Селезньова, StanProg @bgwikisource ====
{{sr-request
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|domain = bg.wikisource
|domain = bg.wikisource
|user name = Алиса Селезньова
|user name = Алиса Селезньова
Line 109: Line 109:
}}
}}
{{sr-request
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|status = done<!--don't change this line-->
|domain = bg.wikisource
|domain = bg.wikisource
|user name = StanProg
|user name = StanProg
Line 119: Line 119:


Thank you very much and wishing you some really enjoyable holidays!<br><span style="font-family:'Droid Sans', Calibri, Verdana, sans; color:silver;">—&nbsp;[[User:Iliev|Luchesar]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Iliev|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Iliev|C]]</small></span> 16:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much and wishing you some really enjoyable holidays!<br><span style="font-family:'Droid Sans', Calibri, Verdana, sans; color:silver;">—&nbsp;[[User:Iliev|Luchesar]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:Iliev|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Iliev|C]]</small></span> 16:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

{{TempSysop|24|2024|12|31||}} --[[User:Sotiale|Sotiale]] ([[User talk:Sotiale|talk]]) 14:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


=== Interface administrator access ===
=== Interface administrator access ===

Revision as of 14:07, 31 December 2022

Shortcut:
SRP

This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure. Minimum voting requirement are listed here.

Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.

  • Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
  • If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
  • For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type !steward in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type @steward for non-urgent help.

Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.

Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions

(translate | edit)

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

Requests

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below: 

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
  |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
  |domain    =
  |user name =
  |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

QRNKS@kaawikipedia

Status:    In progress

Good day, I am a member of the Karakalpak Wikipedia, in general, votes were collected, one of the participants is against, because the spelling errors of my words, I myself recently switched from Cyrillic to Latin, of course, everyone has the first spelling mistake, but this does not mean cannot write an article , or protect against spam members. There are old articles that need to be corrected. I ask you to give the right to the administration QRNKS (talk) 07:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(non-steward comment) @QRNKS: It is good seeing you here and want to help out. As you said on top, I agree with you, everyone makes spelling errors. But that's not the case, anyway, can you say something about your block on tkwiki. Thank you. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 10:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(non-steward comment) I had a question. There are many spelling mistakes in the article. If there is an administrator who writes this article, who will correct the mistakes of others. The article is not an encyclopedic article. PirjanovNurlan (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This was pointed out above, I have written about it in detail. QRNKS (talk) 17:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tumbuka Arch I am now unblocked, up until this point I was blocked on the tk wiki project as a spam member made a change I shouldn't have made there, but now I can edit make a change on the project as the tkwiki admin warned me about my possibility and unblocked, no restriction QRNKS (talk) 06:47, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay great. Good to go then and it is now up to stewards. Tumbuka Arch (talk) 06:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tessla@ckbwikipedia

Status:    Done

it's been two weeks since the RFA has started, 3 Supports with no Objection, overall five participants, Please Grant Permanent Administrator Rights for the successful candidate thanks. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so far we got an objection and the translation would be: "in my opinion we don't need more admins for now". and i can say that we do need Tessla to fill in some necessary admin areas. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 23:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm kinda stuck here as two people speak in opposition of it in regards to not needing more administrators. I do see though that Sakura emad is willing to mentor the person. I think the discussion needs to continue to come to a resolution. -- Amanda (she/her) 18:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AmandaNP: the only person that shows opposition is user:Épine, other than that user:haryad only recommends that we should not add more admins "because we don't need more admins as it's not benefits the project", clearly he is not opposed to more admins; but i as an administrator who patrols ckb wiki actively every single day knows what's the best for the project in the current situation; i say that we need more admins to fill in necessary gaps that the project needs, obviously as the day passes current admins cannot actively participate and carry out their duties and do what's best for the project in time, and the election past two weeks already; although the desired time is one week but i ended up delaying it; waiting for more users to participate; calculating what's the best for the project i supported the candidate to serve as an admin, thanks. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 20:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm definitely for promotion, don't get me wrong. I believe you when you say you need more admins. The thing is is opposition doesn't always come in opposes. and as a steward I have to take all feedback in. I'm not declining this, but looking for comments from my fellow stewards. -- Amanda (she/her) 20:58, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
hello @AmandaNP the discussion is going on for a good amount of time since the last time we've talked, can we please re-check the discussion and decide accordingly? 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given the additional votes on the page, Done. -- Amanda (she/her) 19:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thank you. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Musaddam Idriss@ffwikipedia

Status:    Done

̀Hello, I am the first and only admin of Fulfulde Wikipedia, I have been active as a temporary sysop since September, 2022. During this period, I have used the opportunity in merging, deleting and cleaning up of junk/spam pages. I just discovered tonight that the sysop right was taken from me in the Fulfulde Wikipedia. I therefore, request to be made a permanent admin to enable me continue keeping the Fulfulde Wikipedia in check. Thank you.

 On hold until December 26 and please note that MVR must be satisfied if you want to become a permanent admin. -- Amanda (she/her) 02:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2023-06-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Amanda (she/her) 19:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Musaddam Idriss (talk) 16:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awangba Mangang@mniWikipedia

Status:    Done

I want to extend my admin right & Interface Admin right. A Mangang (talk) 08:55, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 2022-12-28. --Sotiale (talk) 07:57, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Sotiale (talk) 03:17, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awangba Mangang@mniWiktionary

Status:    Done

I want to extend my admin right & Interface Admin right. A Mangang (talk) 09:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 2022-12-28. --Sotiale (talk) 07:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Sotiale (talk) 03:17, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ehitaja@et.wq

Status:    Done

It's again that time of the year that I can bring the good tidings about a vote in et.wq in support of my hopefully continued adminship. Please react to that piece of news in a way that might seem appropriate to all concerned, thank you very much. --Ehitaja (talk) 22:37, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2024-12-31. --Sotiale (talk) 14:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Алиса Селезньова, StanProg @bgwikisource

Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Dear Colleagues,

Could you please renew the adminship of Алиса Селезньова and StanProg in bgsource for another year (2021's application, 2020's application) or maybe—our community would appreciate this very much—even for two years? As a former sysop, elected three times in the past in the same project—in 2017 (6 mo)diff, 2018 (1 y)diff, and 2019 (1 y)diff—and three times in bgbooks—in 2018 (6 mo and 1 y)diff, diff and 2019 (2 y)diff—I fully endorse my colleagues and once again thank them for volunteering to pick up the baton.

Thank you very much and wishing you some really enjoyable holidays!
— Luchesar • T/C 16:50, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2024-12-31. --Sotiale (talk) 14:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interface administrator access

See Interface admin for information about this user group.

  • If you are requesting adminship and the interface admin at the same time, you can file one request in administrator section and state you want interface adminship as well.
  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request interface administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
  • Since the end of 2018, all interface administrators are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled. Please, enable it before posting your request here.
  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew interface adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request interface adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want interface adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent interface adminship and the duration of interface adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

Alison@scowikipedia / CiphriusKane@scowikipedia

Status:    On hold
Status:    On hold

I'm Alison (talk · contribs) - admin and bureaucrat on the Irish Wikipedia. I'm currently working on the Scots Wikipedia on rebuilding their main page, and adding features, templates, gadget and Mediawiki localization, local js and css, etc. I've done this before on gawiki as well as gvwiki, and know my way around the inner workings of Mediawiki reasonably well.

There is no bureaucrat over on scowiki, three local admins, and nobody who can edit the interface. There are no local policies in place regarding elevated privileges, admin ship, etc. I'm requesting;

We're in discussions on the Scots Language Discord server, and are working together on rebuilding some of the infrastructure over there for their language (it's mostly in English right now) - Alison ❤ 03:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 2023-01-05, pending local discussion. Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See Bureaucrat for information about this user group.
  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

CheckUser access

See CheckUser policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.

FoBe@huwiki

Status:    On hold

I have been elected as CU by the hu.wikipedia community, with 27 in favour and none opposed. – FoBe (talk) 17:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending on the candidate's signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (see instructions) and Wikimedia Foundation confirmation of the same -- Amanda (she/her) 19:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

See Oversight policy for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.
  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .
  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

Miscellaneous requests

Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.

Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:

  • SRB — Local or global bot status
  • SRGP — Global permissions

Mohanad Kh@arwikibooks

Status:    On hold

Temporary Importer, Needed for importing migrated wikibooks content from another sister project Mohanad Kh Talk 21:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Comment The Arabic Wikipedia community (which includes all active members of the Arabic Sister Projects at the time) agreed (on 17 January 2019) that any discussion/nomination/policy involving the Arabic Sister Projects should be brought up on this page, in order to notify the community, as there are no active communities on these projects. The policy states "Any discussion/nominations in sister projects must be announced in Sister project village pump, and any discussion that has not been announced on it, it's summary is unofficial". Since the announcement of this policy until now, all of discussion/nomination/policy it is announced in this village (Please see Archives). But I can't found any link of above nomination on previous mentioned village. (I'm commenting as a sysop in Arabic Wikibooks). Best --Alaa :)..! 10:42, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thx @Alaa for comment, I really respect that, but correct me if I'm wrong, this consensus will be mandatory, if it's approved and documented in these projects as mini-policy or guideline (or even as discussion consensus), which didn't happen actually, except that, it has no any consideration (Just an objective point-of-view ) --Mohanad Kh Talk 16:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please, notify the community as suggested above and allow the discussion to run for a week. Ruslik (talk) 20:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0 I don't really understand, I already did that (I mean ar.wikibooks community), so that's actually weird and confusing. Let's suppose that the same users community have the same discussion on en.wikipedia, and they have agreed on the same consensus, but you have to notify them on some en.wikipedia page, should I do it there also? Is that a common thing? And all that happens without any policy or guideline terms on those projects?!Note To be honest with you, I don't really care about request as much as I care about answer to this question, cause it will change my view literally and make me thinking twice about developing sister projects --Mohanad Kh Talk 21:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I mean those users community agreed on some wikimedia space and that's enough, they don't need to document this consensus on every related project to be official. --Mohanad Kh Talk 22:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seems nobody has an answer. Please close request --Mohanad Kh Talk 16:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

PirjanovNurlan@kaawikipedia

Status:    Not done

Hi there! I am a kaawiki user, an admin named NurlanPirzhanov has blocked me for no reason, I ask you to remove me from the administration, when he was an admin, Kaawiki was filled with plagiarized articles without categories and sources, I contacted him via telegram messenger and asked why the plagiarized articles when I asked that it was not deleted, he said that he agreed with those who wrote the plagiarized articles. He also insulted me as a cow via Telegram messenger. (Рахман3 (talk) 11:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]

(non-steward comment) @Рахман3: There is no user named NurlanPirjanov on kaawiki (or even globally). Could it be that you meant PirjanovNurlan in your request? Apart from that, stewards are unlikely to act in cases in which there hasn't been any discussion in the local community (or where other appropriate local procedures weren't followed, like the ones for appealing blocks). Could you please clarify whether the actions you mention have been the subject of previous discussion? Daniuu (talk) 11:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, there was no discussion, One thing you need to understand is that he has secured his discussion page and blocked me indefinitely, how can I have a discussion like you said? So do you think what he did was the right thing to do? Long live the unfair world 👏👏👏👏👏 (Рахман3 (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
So admins can do anything. can block a person for life for no reason, what if there is no reason to block? (Рахман3 (talk) 12:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Please find a reason why I'm blocked!(Рахман3 (talk) 12:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
@Рахман3: I don't take any views on the block affecting you. I would just like to clarify that revoking someone's administrator rights is a serious action that stewards don't take lightly (and that it typically requires a local consensus or other heavy grounds). Daniuu (talk) 14:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To be rude to people who were admins before and who are admins now. This user has been inactive since 2016. I consider these insults to be an obstacle to the development of Wikipedia. If you decide to remove the block from @Рахман3, I will request to remove my profile from wikipedia.
translatewiki.net PirjanovNurlan (talk) 14:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am now a regular user and it has insulted me. I was banned from wikipedia for life for no reason, my candidacy for admin was removed and I was required to edit 200 times a month for 3 months to become an admin, this requirement was not discussed in the forum, what other weighty evidence is needed?(Рахман3 (talk) 15:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
He is against me becoming an administrator, if I become an administrator, his monopoly in Kaaviki will end, that's why he is afraid. (Рахман3 (talk) 15:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Not done No discussion or evidence of an emergency. If there is a problem, an RfC can determine the outcome. -- Amanda (she/her) 15:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
look here, without any reason, my candidacy for admin was removed. (Рахман3 (talk) 15:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
look here Amanda (she/her) If you can find a reason to block me, I'll give you the most expensive car in the world! (Рахман3 (talk) 16:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
look here Why does the bureaucrat protect the election page? because people will vote for me. (Рахман3 (talk) 16:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]

look here, without any reason, my candidacy for admin was removed. He blocked me, how are you asking for a talk page? Amanda (she) Do you have a brain? (Рахман3 (talk) 16:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]

@Рахман3: First, we don't need to resort to insulting to discuss this, please refrain from doing so. Beyond that, it looks like you are claiming they plagiarize (making copyright violations) articles. They are alleging that you made insults to other users. While removing your RfA is a concern, it's not enough to use our emergency power to revoke their permissions. We have policies we have to follow too. Any concerns about abuse of power will need a RFC on the matter to take any action.
In regards to your block, please speak with another admin on the site via email or by using their talkpage here on meta. Make your appeal to them if you disagree with this decision of this administrator. Stewards can not unilaterally unblock you. -- Amanda (she/her) 23:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Amanda I'm blocked. I can't write to anyone. Don't you even realize that? If the meta can't do anything, call this place the Garbage room, not the meta! (Рахман3 (talk) 04:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
I have shown enough evidence, You don't even want to hear it, Has there been any evidence specifically (on Wikipedia) that I have insulted anyone? I showed you that he removed my candidacy for admin, but my candidacy was not withdrawn? which rule does this follow? (Рахман3 (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
You are not blocked here on meta. That is where I suggest you email/talk to these administrators from your wiki. Like I said, I can't act unilaterally, and there has to be consensus that this administrators actions are abuse. You can start an RfC for that. -- Amanda (she/her) 05:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How do I open this RCF? Why do I have to justify myself? Do I have to write everywhere and ask for help to justify myself as a guilty person? you have exhausted the nerves! (Рахман3 (talk) 06:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Meta:Requests for comment/Give a reason to block — Meta
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_comment/Give_a_reason_to_block#Comments Рахман3 (talk) 06:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Amanda (she/her) I'm asking you for a reason to block, do you understand? cause cause cause cause cause cause cause I'll return it again, please give me a reason to block. (Рахман3 (talk) 07:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
@PirjanovNurlan can you please clarify why you blocked them, removed their request, and protected the election page so that only admins can edit them? I tried figuring it out myself but the google translate didn't help much. I can't really make sense of the situation here.
@Рахман3 what you created is to request comments on issue involving meta wiki. You will need to read the guidelines at Requests for comment and follow the guidelines there. However, I recommend doing as Amanda said above and try contacting other admins from the site first. That being said, if the blocking admin could just clarify the reasons for their block, it would solve a lot of trouble.--BRP ever 10:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I repeat to you, there is no reason to block, is it so hard to understand? (Рахман3 (talk) 12:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
Amanda (she/her) I am waiting for your answer! (Рахман3 (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]
You need to calm down. I was helping 400 other people this morning edit Wikipedia, and when you first messaged me, it was 2am last night. You are not the only one having issues. Now, I have moved the RfC to the appropriate space, BRPever has asked PirjanovNurlan for a block reason, and you still have the option to contact the other administrators on your wiki here on meta. We do not have the authority to unblock you. Please review what we have said and take a step back. If you continue to be belligerent, you will be blocked here also, but I don't want to have to do that. -- Amanda (she/her) 18:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barcex@eswiki

Status:    Done

Per our local policy. This user has fewer than 50 administrative actions in the last two years, so the bureaucrat and administrator rights should be removed. Greetings, --Stïnger （会話） 01:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Done -- Amanda (she/her) 02:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.Ajedrez@eswiki

Status:    Done

Per our local policy. This user has fewer than 50 administrative actions in the last two years, so the bureaucrat and administrator rights should be removed. Greetings, --Stïnger （会話） 01:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Done -- Amanda (she/her) 02:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warko@eswiki

Status:    In progress

Although Warko recently had an increased activity while editing on Wikipedia, our local policy is clear about inactivity. Having fewer than 50 administrative actions (46 in total) in the last two years is a reason to remove both administrator and bureaucrat rights. --Stïnger （会話） 22:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Comment Comment @Stïnger I see exactly 50 admin actions in the last 2 years (46 "ordinary" admin actions plus four moves with "suppress redirect" enabled: [1] [2] [3] [4]). The policy is not very clear on whether suppressing redirects constitutes a sysop action. Considering that only eswiki sysops [and bots] can suppress redirects, I lean towards counting those to the admin actions limit. Posting this as a comment for now – in case this question (is suppressredirect a sysop action?) was discussed locally, I'd appreciate having a link to that discussion. Sincerely, Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comment @Martin Urbanec: Yes, I see only sysops and bots can suppressredirect, but despite of that, currently the local policy is not mentioning suppressredirect officially as an admin action, see the official list, so if it's not listed in the policy that part seems to be unclear. I will try to find if there's a local discussion about suppressredirect. Greetings, --Stïnger （会話） 20:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]
FYI, I couldn't find any discussion about this, so I've opened one. --Stïnger （会話） 21:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks for starting it. Please let us know if it reaches any conclusion on that question. Leaving the request opened in the meanwhile. Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PirjanovNurlan@kaawikipedia

Status:    Not done

Several times during the discussion I asked him for evidence as to why he blocked. but could not provide any evidence. I have to protect Wikipedia from people like you. said such baseless insults. I also proved that he was abusing admin rights, he didn't respond and that proves his abuse of admin rights is unreasonable. (Рахман3 (talk) 08:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Not done @Рахман3: @AmandaNP: already declined your request few sections above. Wikimedia Stewards aren't dictators who can revoke adminship at will. If there is consensus either locally or in the global RFC you started, privileges will be removed, but it can't be done without consensus. Please don't fill a repeated request until consensus can be demonstrated. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How do we know that consensus is proven? Should we wait for him to confess in person? Рахман3 (talk) 13:11, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is an agreement of the community to do something. In this case, the appropriate community is either kaa.wikipedia local community, or the global community (composed from participants of all Wikimedia projects). As it was noted above, the global community discusses matters like this one in a global RfC like th. As I already noted above, the Wikimedia Stewards are not dictators, and may not unilaterally remove admins – only the community has that authority. SRP is simply not an appropriate venue for this kind of an issue, as Stewards aren't authorized to take a decision here. Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Who makes the summary of the RFC? Рахман3 (talk) 07:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Рахман3: Global RfCs are governed by this policy. By the way, this request page serves for processing permission changes only. In case you have any other question about this, feel free to contact me directly on my talk page. Sincerely, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:36, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions&oldid=24306665"