Minutes of DPDK Technical Board Meeting, 2024-04-03

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Wed Apr 24 17:24:14 CEST 2024


Members Attending: 10/11
	- Aaron Conole
	- Bruce Richardson
	- Hemant Agrawal
	- Honnappa Nagarahalli
	- Kevin Traynor
	- Konstantin Ananyev
	- Maxime Coquelin
	- Morten Brørup
	- Stephen Hemminger
	- Thomas Monjalon (Chair)

NOTE: The Technical Board meetings take place every second Wednesday at 3 pm UTC
on https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/96459488340?password=d808f1f6-0a28-4165-929e-5a5bcae7efeb
Meetings are public, and DPDK community members are welcome to attend.
Agenda and minutes can be found at http://core.dpdk.org/techboard/minutes


1/ MSVC

Work to be able to compile DPDK with MSVC is progressing.

Regarding the tooling, UNH CI is testing MSVC in Windows Server 2022 job.
There was an ask for GHA job building with MSVC.
Example:
	https://github.com/danielzsh/spark/blob/master/.github/workflows/compile.yml

We should not break MSVC compilation for enabled libraries.
When creating a new library, we should require to allow MSVC where it makes sense.
Some guidelines could be added in doc/guides/contributing/design.rst


2/ function inlining

There are pros and cons for function inlining.

There should not be inlining in control path functions.
Inlining should be avoided in public headers because of ABI compatibility issue
and structures being exported because of inline requirement.

Inlining should be used with care, with benchmarks as a proof of efficiency.
Having too much inlining will have a drawback on instruction cache,
that's why we should justify any new usage of inline.

Note that the same recommendations apply with the use of prefetch and likely/unlikely.




More information about the dev mailing list