Verfasst von: | Gillmann, Nina |
Titel: | Interagency coordination during disaster |
Titelzusatz: | strategic choices for the UN, NGOs, and other humanitarian actors in the field |
Mitwirkende: | Varwick, Johannes [Doktorvater] |
Verf.angabe: | Nina Gillmann |
Ausgabe: | 1. Aufl. |
Verlagsort: | Baden-Baden |
Verlag: | Nomos |
Jahr: | 2010 |
Umfang: | 351 S. |
Illustrationen: | graph. Darst. |
Gesamttitel/Reihe: | The United Nations and global change ; 4 |
Weitere Titel: | Diss.-Titel auf der Vortitelseite: The challenge of interagency coordination in humanitarian emergencies |
Inhalt: | Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction -- 1.1. Purpose of the Study -- 1.2. Proceedings of the Study -- 1.3. Research Method -- 1.3.1. Research Assumptions -- 1.3.2. Case Study Approach -- 1.3.3. Theory Development -- 2. Coordination and Humanitarian Relief -- Current State of Literature -- 2.1. Overview of Major Strands in the Literature -- 2.2. Interorganizational Coordination as a Subject of Concern in the Literature on Humanitarian Relief -- 2.2.1. Individual and Group Performance Reviews -- 2.2.2. First Generation Studies -- the 1990s -- 2.2.3. Second Generation Studies -- The New Millennium and Humanitarian Reform -- 2.2.4. Preliminary Remarks -- 2.3. Main Shortcomings of Studies on Humanitarian Relief to Date -- 2.4. First Forays into Applying Lessons from Organization Science to Humanitarian Relief -- 2.5. Summary and Concluding Remarks -- 3. Trends and Actors in Global Humanitarian Action -- 3.1. Trends in Financing Humanitarian Aid -- 3.1.1. Humanitarian vs. Development Aid. |
| 3.1.2. Donor Concentration -- 3.1.3. Bilateralization of Humanitarian Aid -- 3.2. The Humanitarian Reform Agenda and the Role of the UN -- 3.2.1. The Humanitarian Coordinator System -- 3.2.2. The Cluster Approach -- 3.2.3. The Changing Role of the Humanitarian UN Agencies -- 3.3. State Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect -- 3.4. Politicization of Humanitarian Aid -- 3.5. Overview of Main Humanitarian Actors -- 3.5.1. The Humanitarian UN Agencies -- 3.5.2. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) -- 3.5.3. The Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement -- 3.5.4. Governmental and Military Actors -- 3.6. Summary and Concluding Remarks -- 4. Coordination of Humanitarian Relief: A Theory-Guided Approach -- 4.1. Coordination in International Relations Theory -- 4.1.1. International Relations Theories and the Role of International Non-State Actors -- 4.1.2. Applicability of International Relations Theories to the Coordination of Humanitarian Relief -- 4.2. Interagency Coordination in Organization Theory -- 4.2.1. Coordination in Organization Theory -- A Brief Introduction. |
| 4.2.2. Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks as Basic Organization Forms -- 4.2.3. Determinants of Network Formation -- 4.2.4. The Network as a Suitable Analytical Model for Humanitarian Relief -- 4.2.5. Shortcomings of Network Approach and Consequences for Theory Development -- 4.3. UN Coordination Revisited -- 4.4. A New Framework for Coordination -- 4.4.1. Donini Revisited -- 4.4.2. The Relevant Context of Coordination -- 4.4.3. A New Quadripartite Typology of Interagency Coordination -- 4.4.4. Sythesis -- 4.5. Summary and Concluding Remarks -- 5. Case Study: The Humanitarian Crisis in Darfur -- 5.1. Historical Background -- 5.1.1. The History of Darfur up until 2003 -- 5.1.2. The Darfur Conflict (2003-2007) -- 5.2. Record of the Humanitarian Relief Response to Date -- 5.2.1. Initial Set-up and Structure of the International Humanitarian Response -- 5.2.2. Achievements and Disappointments -- 5.3. The Relevant Context of Humanitarian Relief in Darfur -- 5.3.1. Development of Network Characteristics -- 5.3.2. Network Catalysts -- 5.3.3. Power -- 5.3.4. The Structure of Interests among Humanitarian Actors. |
| 5.4. Coordination as Loose Alliance, Orchestrated Alliance, Lead Partnership, or Lead Agency -- 5.4.1. Network Outcomes -- 5.4.2. Internal Capacity and External Legitimacy of the Most Critical Actor(s) -- 5.4.3. Preferred vs. Actual Coordination Types -- 5.5. Summary and Concluding Remarks -- 6. Conclusions -- 6.1. Summary of Findings -- 6.2. Recommendations -- 6.2.1. General Normative Implications -- 6.2.2. Generic Actor-Specific Implications -- 6.2.3. Generic Network-Specific Implications -- 6.2.4. Improving Humanitarian Practices -- Tentative Suggestions -- 6.3. Critical Assessment -- 6.3.1. Practical Limitations -- 6.3.2. The Role of Donors in Coordination -- 6.3.3. Research Method and Scope -- 6.4. Perspectives for Future Research -- 6.4.1. Towards a Coordination Spectrum and Alternative Design Criteria -- 6.4.2. From Structural Design to Process -- 6.4.3. Donor Preferences and Coordination -- 6.4.4. Further Exploration of Organization Theory. |
Hochschulschrift: | Zugl.: Kiel, Univ., Diss., 2010 |
ISBN: | 978-3-8329-5708-7 |
URL: | Inhaltsverzeichnis: http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/634752464.pdf |
Schlagwörter: | (s)Internationale Organisation / (s)Humanitäre Hilfe / (s)Koordination |
| (g)Darfur / (s)Humanitäre Hilfe / (s)Koordination |
| (s)Internationale Organisation / (s)Humanitäre Hilfe / (s)Koordination |
| (g)Darfur / (s)Humanitäre Hilfe / (s)Koordination |
Dokumenttyp: | Hochschulschrift |
Sprache: | eng |
Reproduktion: | Online-Ausg.: Gillmann, Nina: Interagency coordination during disaster. - Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010. - 351 S |
RVK-Notation: | MK 8800 |
K10plus-PPN: | 634752464 |
Verknüpfungen: | → Übergeordnete Aufnahme |