-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 468
Closed
Description
As brought up by @brentvatne: https://twitter.com/notbrent/status/1130517657546043394 and suggested by @vincentriemer
Basically:
- yarn add react-testing-library
+ yarn add @testing-library/react
I think that I would still refer to it in writing/speaking as "react testing library."
I think it's a good idea and I grabbed https://npm.im/~testing-library so we should be good to start doing this.
I just want to hear what folks have to say.
Here's how I think we should do it:
- Each package maintainer gets to choose whether they want to be publishing their package under the scope and what version to publish at first.
- I think I'd like to publish the ones I'm primarily responsible for as 1.0.0 on that scope.
- Publish a new major version of each package that has moved which is immediately deprecated with a message indicating people should migrate to the new scoped package.
What thoughts do you all have?
timdeschryver, alexkrolick, wyze, afontcu, mohsinulhaq and 9 morebcarroll22, klujanrosas, CheezItMan and guilhermepiovesantimdeschryver, barakplasma and boxgames1
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels