Skip to content

Conversation

@wouterj
Copy link
Member

@wouterj wouterj commented Jun 28, 2015

Pfew 😓

Warning: This PR is in very rough shape. It's written in one go, without reviewing what I've written. You can read it, but please don't waste your time doing detailed reviews and only review it very globally.

The current component docs have been written a long time ago. During the years, lots of people have struggled with the Security component. The community has tried to solve this by explaining the component in different ways (like a talk, a book, etc.). We've learned which way of explaining people like. Now it's time to improve the official docs!

The Goals

  • Always show the big picture; what's involved in having a working security system
  • Clearly show where one should extend/customize the system and were one shouldn't
  • Show how to use the component standalone, including its sub-components.

Todo

  • Write Core/Authorization article
  • Write HTTP article (which basically is about Authentication)
  • Reread... tweak... reread... review... tweak
  • Remove old component docs

PR Info Table

Q A
Fixed docs? yes
New docs? yes (no new features though)
Applies to 2.3+
Fixed tickets At least #5289, #4759

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This paragraph needs some additional explanation about how can this auth provider possibly exist. Why do we need to authenticate anonymous users?

@weaverryan
Copy link
Member

@wouterj I'm closing this PR because it's old and stalled. See #7496

@weaverryan weaverryan closed this Jul 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants