Removed duplicate "long"s in length constraint #5102
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
👍 nice catch @bystones |
|
Yes, this is much better now. Thanks Felix! |
weaverryan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2015
This PR was submitted for the 2.5 branch but it was merged into the 2.3 branch instead (closes #5102). Discussion ---------- Removed duplicate "long"s in length constraint | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Doc fix? | [yes] | New docs? | [no] | Applies to | 2.5+ The maxMessage seems to have one long too many. This does apply to all maintained versions. Alternative could be: ``` maxMessage: "Your first name cannot be more than {{ limit }} characters long" ``` Commits ------- dcffc02 Removed duplicate "long"s
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The maxMessage seems to have one long too many. This does apply to all maintained versions.
Alternative could be: