Prevent code size explosion due to blindly inlining methods marked @inline #2
Labels
Milestone
Comments
retronym
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 24, 2015
The log messages intented to chronicle implicit search were always being filtered out by virtue of the fact that the the tree passed to `printTyping` was already typed, (e.g. with an implicit MethodType.) This commit enabled printing in this case, although it still filters out trees that are deemed unfit for typer tracing, such as `()`. In the context of implicit search, this happens to filter out the noise of: ``` | | | [search #2] start `()`, searching for adaptation to pt=Unit => Foo[Int,Int] (silent: value <local Test> in Test) implicits disabled | | | [search #3] start `()`, searching for adaptation to pt=(=> Unit) => Foo[Int,Int] (silent: value <local Test> in Test) implicits disabled | | | \-> <error> ``` ... which I think is desirable. The motivation for this fix was to better display the interaction between implicit search and type inference. For instance: ``` class Foo[A, B] class Test { implicit val f: Foo[Int, String] = ??? def t[A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A, B]) = ??? t(1) } ``` ```` % scalac -Ytyper-debug sandbox/instantiate.scala ... | |-- t(1) BYVALmode-EXPRmode (site: value <local Test> in Test) | | |-- t BYVALmode-EXPRmode-FUNmode-POLYmode (silent: value <local Test> in Test) | | | [adapt] [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing adapted to [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing | | | \-> (a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing | | |-- 1 BYVALmode-EXPRmode-POLYmode (site: value <local Test> in Test) | | | \-> Int(1) | | solving for (A: ?A, B: ?B) | | solving for (B: ?B) | | [search #1] start `[A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing` inferring type B, searching for adaptation to pt=Foo[Int,B] (silent: value <local Test> in Test) implicits disabled | | [search #1] considering f | | [adapt] f adapted to => Foo[Int,String] based on pt Foo[Int,B] | | [search #1] solve tvars=?B, tvars.constr= >: String <: String | | solving for (B: ?B) | | [search #1] success inferred value of type Foo[Int,=?String] is SearchResult(Test.this.f, TreeTypeSubstituter(List(type B),List(String))) | | |-- [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing BYVALmode-EXPRmode (site: value <local Test> in Test) | | | \-> Nothing | | [adapt] [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing adapted to [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing | | \-> Nothing ```
|
Done in scala/scala#7133 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently, every method marked
@inlineis inlined, which can lead to exponential code growth.We should probably have two kinds of threshold: one for the maximum method size, one for the maximum method growth.
Discussion and further references here: scala/scala#4041 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: