Skip to content

use ? to simplify TransitiveRelation.maybe_map #53271

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2018

Conversation

llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

@llogiq llogiq commented Aug 11, 2018

I think this looks much clearer than the original.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 11, 2018
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ impl<T: Clone + Debug + Eq + Hash> TransitiveRelation<T> {
edges: vec![],
closure: Lock::new(None),
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, I added this by mistake.

@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the simplify-maybe-map branch from a09846d to 2fac7df Compare August 11, 2018 16:09
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Aug 13, 2018

r? @joshtriplett

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@llogiq Please don't backmerge master into your feature branch. If you need to update your feature branch, please rebase it instead.

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

For some reason, when I try to review lines of your commit, I get this:

Start commit oid is not part of the pull request

In any case: please drop the change to add_index, which seems unrelated to the change described in the commit message.

Apart from that, this looks great.

@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the simplify-maybe-map branch from a496942 to 05ddad3 Compare August 13, 2018 21:12
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Aug 13, 2018

This is what happens when one uses the UI (I was on mobile earlier). The history should now be fixed.

@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Aug 14, 2018

@joshtriplett r?

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 14, 2018

📌 Commit 05ddad3 has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 14, 2018
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Aug 15, 2018

@bors rollup

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2018
…iplett

use ? to simplify `TransitiveRelation.maybe_map`

I think this looks much clearer than the original.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2018
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #52453 (improve diagnostics for tests with custom return values)
 - #53271 (use ? to simplify `TransitiveRelation.maybe_map`)
 - #53279 (Extend documentation of `rustc_on_unimplemented`)
 - #53342 (fix error for unsized packed struct field)
 - #53344 (Add doc examples for std::alloc::{alloc,alloc_zeroed}.)
 - #53368 (Ignore test that fails on stage1)
 - #53388 (Fix links' color)
 - #53396 (Fix since of Iterator::flatten to be a proper semver)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 05ddad3 into rust-lang:master Aug 15, 2018
@llogiq llogiq deleted the simplify-maybe-map branch August 15, 2018 23:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants