Skip to content

Improve lint handling in rustdoc #52233

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2018

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 10, 2018
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 11, 2018

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 11, 2018

📌 Commit 90b3e2c has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 11, 2018
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2018
…g, r=oli-obk

Improve lint handling in rustdoc

r? @oli-obk
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2018
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #51701 (Better docs for copy_from_slice & clone_from_slice)
 - #52231 (Fix typo in error message E0277)
 - #52233 (Improve lint handling in rustdoc)
 - #52238 (Avoid unwrapping in PanicInfo doc example.)
 - #52241 (Fix typo in E0433 docs)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 90b3e2c into rust-lang:master Jul 11, 2018
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rustdoc-lint-handling branch July 11, 2018 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants