Skip to content

mk: Don't consider LLVM done until it's done #34563

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2016

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Currently if an LLVM build is interrupted after it creates the llvm-config
binary but before it's done it puts us in an inconsistent state where we think
LLVM is compiled but it's not actually. This tweaks our logic to only consider
LLVM done building once it's actually done building.

This should hopefully alleviate problems on the bots where if we interrupt at
the wrong time it doesn't corrupt the build directory.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jun 29, 2016

@bors r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 29, 2016

📌 Commit f94b2f2 has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 30, 2016

⌛ Testing commit f94b2f2 with merge 98f7ce9...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 30, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt-mir

Currently if an LLVM build is interrupted *after* it creates the llvm-config
binary but before it's done it puts us in an inconsistent state where we think
LLVM is compiled but it's not actually. This tweaks our logic to only consider
LLVM done building once it's actually done building.

This should hopefully alleviate problems on the bots where if we interrupt at
the wrong time it doesn't corrupt the build directory.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 30, 2016

📌 Commit 9e2bd92 has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 30, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 9e2bd92 with merge 949f893...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 30, 2016

⛄ The build was interrupted to prioritize another pull request.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 1, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 9e2bd92 with merge 1628188...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2016
mk: Don't consider LLVM done until it's done

Currently if an LLVM build is interrupted *after* it creates the llvm-config
binary but before it's done it puts us in an inconsistent state where we think
LLVM is compiled but it's not actually. This tweaks our logic to only consider
LLVM done building once it's actually done building.

This should hopefully alleviate problems on the bots where if we interrupt at
the wrong time it doesn't corrupt the build directory.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 1, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-x-android-t

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:47 AM, bors [email protected] wrote:

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-x-android-t
https://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-64-x-android-t/builds/9618


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#34563 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAD95Nd5RIZOWoTNErEGWJZGRkM0wu-Pks5qRNQ8gaJpZM4JBjH5
.

@bors bors merged commit 9e2bd92 into rust-lang:master Jul 1, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the robust-mk branch July 7, 2016 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants