Skip to content

rustdoc: Tweak css of function where clauses #25933

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 2, 2015

Conversation

bluss
Copy link
Member

@bluss bluss commented May 31, 2015

rustdoc: Tweak css of function where clauses

Method where clauses are put indented on a new line, do the same tweak
to free functions, which makes it cleaner and easier to read.

Method where clauses are put indented on a new line, do the same tweak
to free functions, which makes it cleaner and easier to read.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 0ac24d6 rollup

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2015
rustdoc: Tweak css of function where clauses

Method where clauses are put indented on a new line, do the same tweak
to free functions, which makes it cleaner and easier to read.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 0ac24d6 into rust-lang:master Jun 2, 2015
@bluss bluss deleted the rustdoc-fn-css branch June 2, 2015 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants