Skip to content

Conversation

rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor

@rosnfeld rosnfeld commented Jun 3, 2014

Fixes #2960
Fixes #3490.

Summary of changes:

  • for irregular timeseries plots, considers all lines already plotted when calculating xlim
  • for plots with secondary_y axis, considers lines on both left and right axes when calculating xlim. There are tests for non-timeseries plots (always worked, but now a test to confirm this), irregular timeseries plots, and regular timeseries plots.

This does not fix #6608, which I now think is a fairly specific/rare case that could always be manually avoided by x_compat=True. I will still try and fix that, but it looks a bit uglier and I didn't want to hold back these more important changes.

@jreback jreback added this to the 0.14.1 milestone Jun 3, 2014
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 3, 2014

@TomAugspurger ?

@rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see from another PR that @TomAugspurger is travelling... is there anyone else who could take a look at this? Seems like a nice patch to have in 0.14.1.

(admittedly I am travelling also)

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 19, 2014

@cpcloud can you take a look?

@rosnfeld pls rebase this

@rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased. Thanks for reviving this. Looks like @sinhrks is working on similar material in #7459 and #7515.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 26, 2014

cc @sinhrks can you have a look?

@@ -1598,6 +1598,9 @@ def _make_plot(self):
left, right = _get_xlim(lines)
ax.set_xlim(left, right)

def _get_existing_lines(self):
return self.ax.get_lines() if self.ax else []
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this also try to search on both right and left axes?

@rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good catch. I had created test_secondary_y_irregular_ts_xlim to test a secondary_y case but as written it only makes sure that a "primary" (non-secondary) axis is taken into consideration when you plot on the secondary axis, but not the other way around. I've strengthened the test and updated the code.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 30, 2014

@rosnfeld pls rebase

@rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

rosnfeld commented Jul 1, 2014

Rebased.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 1, 2014

one more rebase pls (i just merged bunch of plot stuff)

@rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

rosnfeld commented Jul 1, 2014

Ok, rebased again.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 1, 2014

ok, ping when green

@rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

rosnfeld commented Jul 1, 2014

Travis is green on my fork but will take a while on the main pydata one I think. I am in Asia at the moment and unfortunately need to sleep. :)

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 1, 2014

hahha...np...thanks

@rosnfeld
Copy link
Contributor Author

rosnfeld commented Jul 1, 2014

Alright, it's green now.

jreback added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2014
BUG: xlim on plots with shared axes (GH2960, GH3490)
@jreback jreback merged commit 87e7e27 into pandas-dev:master Jul 1, 2014
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jul 1, 2014

thanks!

@rosnfeld rosnfeld deleted the xlim_issues branch July 3, 2014 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
3 participants