Skip to content

✨ Add in catalog label selection support #1164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Aug 22, 2024

Fix #1112

Adds some tests to validate the label selector.
Modified some tests to add labels and selectors. They are not necessary now, but will be once 1110 is resolved; as that issue adds the ambiguity that this PR helps resolve.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@tmshort tmshort requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2024 14:51
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3d63ab6
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/66c776a90ec01500083487c0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1164--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Aug 22, 2024

Adding a reference to #1110 here, so it doesn't get resolved when this is merged...

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.37%. Comparing base (13efcd0) to head (3d63ab6).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
internal/resolve/catalog.go 75.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1164      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.45%   75.37%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        1919     1925       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         1448     1451       +3     
- Misses        329      331       +2     
- Partials      142      143       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 58.02% <50.00%> (-0.19%) ⬇️
unit 50.85% <75.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tmshort tmshort mentioned this pull request Aug 22, 2024
4 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@dtfranz dtfranz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 22, 2024
@dtfranz dtfranz added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Aug 22, 2024
@dtfranz dtfranz added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 245e580 Aug 22, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@tmshort tmshort deleted the add-labels branch August 22, 2024 18:47
@skattoju skattoju mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Hook label selection into resolution + test
2 participants