--- title: Adding Instance Properties type: cookbook order: 2 --- ## Base Example There may be data/utilities you'd like to use in many components, but you don't want to [pollute the global scope](https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/2nd-ed/scope-closures/ch3.md). In these cases, you can make them available to each Vue instance by defining them on the prototype: ```js Vue.prototype.$appName = 'My App' ``` Now `$appName` is available on all Vue instances, even before creation. If we run: ```js new Vue({ beforeCreate: function() { console.log(this.$appName) } }) ``` Then `"My App"` will be logged to the console! ## The Importance of Scoping Instance Properties You may be wondering: > "Why does `appName` start with `$`? Is that important? What does it do? No magic is happening here. `$` is a convention Vue uses for properties that are available to all instances. This avoids conflicts with any defined data, computed properties, or methods. > "Conflicts? What do you mean?" Another great question! If you set: ```js Vue.prototype.appName = 'My App' ``` Then what would you expect to be logged below? ```js new Vue({ data: { // Uh oh - appName is *also* the name of the // instance property we defined! appName: 'The name of some other app' }, beforeCreate: function() { console.log(this.appName) }, created: function() { console.log(this.appName) } }) ``` It would be `"My App"`, then `"The name of some other app"`, because `this.appName` is overwritten ([sort of](https://github.com/getify/You-Dont-Know-JS/blob/2nd-ed/objects-classes/ch5.md)) by `data` when the instance is created. We scope instance properties with `$` to avoid this. You can even use your own convention if you'd like, such as `$_appName` or `ΩappName`, to prevent even conflicts with plugins or future features. ## Real-World Example: Replacing Vue Resource with Axios Let's say you're replacing the [now-retired Vue Resource](https://medium.com/the-vue-point/retiring-vue-resource-871a82880af4). You really enjoyed accessing request methods through `this.$http` and you want to do the same thing with Axios instead. All you have to do is include axios in your project: ```html
``` Alias `axios` to `Vue.prototype.$http`: ```js Vue.prototype.$http = axios ``` Then you'll be able to use methods like `this.$http.get` in any Vue instance: ```js new Vue({ el: '#app', data: { users: [] }, created() { var vm = this this.$http .get('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/users') .then(function(response) { vm.users = response.data }) } }) ``` ## The Context of Prototype Methods In case you're not aware, methods added to a prototype in JavaScript gain the context of the instance. That means they can use `this` to access data, computed properties, methods, or anything else defined on the instance. Let's take advantage of this in a `$reverseText` method: ```js Vue.prototype.$reverseText = function(propertyName) { this[propertyName] = this[propertyName] .split('') .reverse() .join('') } new Vue({ data: { message: 'Hello' }, created: function() { console.log(this.message) // => "Hello" this.$reverseText('message') console.log(this.message) // => "olleH" } }) ``` Note that the context binding will **not** work if you use an ES6/2015 arrow function, as they implicitly bind to their parent scope. That means the arrow function version: ```js Vue.prototype.$reverseText = propertyName => { this[propertyName] = this[propertyName] .split('') .reverse() .join('') } ``` Would throw an error: ```log Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'split' of undefined ``` ## When To Avoid This Pattern As long as you're vigilant in scoping prototype properties, using this pattern is quite safe - as in, unlikely to produce bugs. However, it can sometimes cause confusion with other developers. They might see `this.$http`, for example, and think, "Oh, I didn't know about this Vue feature!" Then they move to a different project and are confused when `this.$http` is undefined. Or, maybe they want to Google how to do something, but can't find results because they don't realize they're actually using Axios under an alias. **The convenience comes at the cost of explicitness.** When looking at a component, it's impossible to tell where `$http` came from. Vue itself? A plugin? A coworker? So what are the alternatives? ## Alternative Patterns ### When Not Using a Module System In applications with **no** module system (e.g. via Webpack or Browserify), there's a pattern that's often used with _any_ JavaScript-enhanced frontend: a global `App` object. If what you want to add has nothing to do with Vue specifically, this may be a good alternative to reach for. Here's an example: ```js var App = Object.freeze({ name: 'My App', version: '2.1.4', helpers: { // This is a purely functional version of // the $reverseText method we saw earlier reverseText: function(text) { return text .split('') .reverse() .join('') } } }) ```

If you raised an eyebrow at `Object.freeze`, what it does is prevent the object from being changed in the future. This essentially makes all its properties constants, protecting you from future state bugs.

Now the source of these shared properties is more obvious: there's an `App` object defined somewhere in the app. To find it, developers can run a project-wide search. Another advantage is that `App` can now be used _anywhere_ in your code, whether it's Vue-related or not. That includes attaching values directly to instance options, rather than having to enter a function to access properties on `this`: ```js new Vue({ data: { appVersion: App.version }, methods: { reverseText: App.helpers.reverseText } }) ``` ### When Using a Module System When you have access to a module system, you can easily organize shared code into modules, then `require`/`import` those modules wherever they're needed. This is the epitome of explicitness, because in each file you gain a list of dependencies. You know _exactly_ where each one came from. While certainly more verbose, this approach is definitely the most maintainable, especially when working with other developers and/or building a large app.