Skip to content

KEP-4191 Split Image Filesystem #4198

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2023

Conversation

kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

@kannon92 kannon92 commented Sep 8, 2023

  • One-line PR description: KEP for Split Filesystem
  • Other comments:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory labels Sep 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 8, 2023
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

kannon92 commented Sep 8, 2023

/sig node

@kannon92 kannon92 force-pushed the kep-4191-split-imagefs branch from 9fc295e to 736b476 Compare September 12, 2023 18:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 13, 2023

- Pods
- Logs
- Containers
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would require containerd snapshotter to support multi-filesystem, i.e. the top (rw) snapshot being on one fs, and the lower (ro) snapshots being on another.

snapshotter implementations need to be changed to make this happen.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you think containerd needs to have support for this to add support in the kubelet to be flexible to handle this? in other words: is it required both CRI be able to do this if the kubelet acts correctly when it's not the case? Then, it could be up to each community on how they want to handle these features

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mikebrow @ruiwen-zhao wdyt?

We talked a bit about this with @mikebrow and i think there can be interest in this in containerd but it would require some work in containerd. But we could still agree on the CRI api in this KEP.

@kannon92 kannon92 changed the title WIP: KEP-4191 Split Image Filesystem KEP-4191 Split Image Filesystem Sep 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 13, 2023
@haircommander
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 2, 2023
@ruiwen-zhao
Copy link
Contributor

Only one comment about running this feature with container runtime that doesn't have the CRI implementation. But for alpha this looks good.

/lgtm

@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@kannon92 kannon92 force-pushed the kep-4191-split-imagefs branch from 08d4236 to 0e70ec7 Compare October 4, 2023 17:57
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 4, 2023
@kannon92 kannon92 force-pushed the kep-4191-split-imagefs branch from 0e70ec7 to 531c4b5 Compare October 4, 2023 18:23
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

kannon92 commented Oct 4, 2023

@dchen1107 I seem to have lost your approval. Can you look this over again?

@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@johnbelamaric johnbelamaric left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few minor points in PRR, but looks pretty good.

@kannon92 kannon92 force-pushed the kep-4191-split-imagefs branch from 531c4b5 to 39707af Compare October 5, 2023 13:17
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 5, 2023
@kannon92 kannon92 force-pushed the kep-4191-split-imagefs branch from 39707af to 14c0960 Compare October 5, 2023 15:52
@kannon92 kannon92 requested a review from johnbelamaric October 5, 2023 16:51
@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dchen1107, johnbelamaric, kannon92

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c3294e2 into kubernetes:master Oct 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.29 milestone Oct 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants