Skip to content

remove base_kernel_url #5100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2014
Merged

remove base_kernel_url #5100

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2014

Conversation

minrk
Copy link
Member

@minrk minrk commented Feb 12, 2014

While we are simplifying base_project_url to base_url, base_kernel_url has never been documented, and has only ever been confusing. In every case I have seen, base_kernel_url should be identical to base_url, so this just removes the separate configuration value.

I would also like to consider getting rid of ws_url, unless someone can make a case for why it should be kept.

closes #5099

@takluyver
Copy link
Member

The term 'kernel server' in a docstring suggests that at one point we were considering that kernels could be handled by a different webserver from the notebooks. Was that ever the case? I don't remember hearing any discussion of it.

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member

I think it probably was to handle the case of kernels running on a
different server. But I don't think we need that anymore (never did).

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Kluyver [email protected]:

The term 'kernel server' in a docstring suggests that at one point we were
considering that kernels could be handled by a different webserver from the
notebooks. Was that ever the case? I don't remember hearing any discussion
of it.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/5100#issuecomment-34934786
.

Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
[email protected] and [email protected]

@minrk
Copy link
Member Author

minrk commented Feb 13, 2014

And because of the new URL scheme, a proxy can send /api/kernels to a different server anyway, so I don't think the separate configurable solves a problem. Related: Can we also get rid of ws_url, or no?

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member

Hmm, I don't actually remember the details is ws_url - will have to look

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 12, 2014, at 6:14 PM, Min RK [email protected] wrote:

And because of the new URL scheme, a proxy can send /api/kernels to a different server anyway, so I don't think the separate configurable solves a problem. Related: Can we also get rid of ws_url, or no?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@minrk
Copy link
Member Author

minrk commented Feb 13, 2014

Hmm, I don't actually remember the details is ws_url - will have to look

It's the same as base_kernel_url - a separate URL, so that the websockets can be on another host. Never used, and can also be handled in the server via a proxy.

@takluyver
Copy link
Member

I don't see any problem with getting rid of ws_url.

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member

The removal of base_kernel_url looks fine. Looking at the ws_url stuff now.

ellisonbg added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2014
@ellisonbg ellisonbg merged commit 517bfbf into ipython:master Feb 21, 2014
@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member

@minrk will remove ws_url in a later PR.

@minrk minrk deleted the base_kernel_url branch March 31, 2014 23:36
mattvonrocketstein pushed a commit to mattvonrocketstein/ipython that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Notebook: Changing base_project_url results in failed WebSockets call
3 participants