Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GRSciColl - make taxonomic coverage part of the general search #390

Closed
ManonGros opened this issue Oct 6, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

GRSciColl - make taxonomic coverage part of the general search #390

ManonGros opened this issue Oct 6, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
GRSciColl Issues related to institutions, collections and staff

Comments

@ManonGros
Copy link
Contributor

It would be nice to be able to look for collections containing a particular group like Aves. Ideally we would have a way to search directly the taxonomic coverage field, but in the meanwhile could the general search include taxonomic coverage?

For example, make it possible for this collection to be included in the result of this search: https://registry.gbif.org/collection/search?q=Insecta

(This is a request coming from a node manager).

@ManonGros ManonGros added the GRSciColl Issues related to institutions, collections and staff label Oct 6, 2021
@marcos-lg marcos-lg self-assigned this Oct 6, 2021
@debpaul
Copy link

debpaul commented Oct 6, 2021

It would be nice to be able to look for collections containing a particular group like Aves. Ideally we would have a way to search directly the taxonomic coverage field, but in the meanwhile could the general search include taxonomic coverage?

Hi @ManonGros again lovely to see these use cases being expressed and know that the TWDG CD group has included metadata concepts so that if used, the software will be able to do what this user is looking for :-)

@nielsraes
Copy link

Indicating major taxonomic groups contained by a collection is indeed quite useful. Under the dashboarding task of SYNTHESYS+ and previously under ICEDIG attempts have been made to come up with unambiguous higher taxonomic groups SYNTHESYS+ D2.2 JOINT DASHBOARD OF COLLECTIONS ASSESSMENT TOOLS provided as appendix https://www.synthesys.info/content/dam/nhm-synthesys/synthesys-plus-deliverables/SYNTHESYS+%20D2.2%20Joint%20dashboard%20of%20collections%20assessment%20tools%20Final.pdf. This higher classification (e.g. Zoology vertebrates --> birds) can be mapped to the GBIF/COL backbone taxonomy https://www.gbif.org/species/212

@marcos-lg
Copy link
Contributor

Deployed to PROD the change to include the taxonomic coverage in the collections search.

@ManonGros
Copy link
Contributor Author

In addition to that, we also have collection descriptors that allow searching by scientific name. It is a matter now of converting the taxonomic coverage to collection descriptors. I will explore that (at least for some collections) in another issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
GRSciColl Issues related to institutions, collections and staff
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants