Skip to content

Run TransportGetEnrichPolicyAction on local node #121124

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

nielsbauman
Copy link
Contributor

This action solely needs the cluster state, it can run on any node. Additionally, it needs to be cancellable to avoid doing unnecessary work after a client failure or timeout.

Relates #101805

This action solely needs the cluster state, it can run on any node.
Additionally, it needs to be cancellable to avoid doing unnecessary work
after a client failure or timeout.
@nielsbauman nielsbauman added >enhancement :Data Management/Ingest Node Execution or management of Ingest Pipelines including GeoIP Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team v9.0.0 labels Jan 29, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-data-management (Team:Data Management)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @nielsbauman, I've created a changelog YAML for you.

Copy link
Member

@dakrone dakrone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nielsbauman nielsbauman enabled auto-merge (squash) January 29, 2025 21:55
@nielsbauman nielsbauman merged commit afdd453 into elastic:main Jan 29, 2025
16 checks passed
@nielsbauman nielsbauman deleted the local-get-enrich branch January 29, 2025 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Data Management/Ingest Node Execution or management of Ingest Pipelines including GeoIP >enhancement Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants