Skip to content

P3500 R1 Are Contracts "safe"? #2190

@wg21bot

Description

@wg21bot
Collaborator

P3500R0 Are Contracts "safe"? (Timur Doumler, Gašper Ažman, Joshua Berne)

Activity

added this to the 2025-telecon milestone on Jan 14, 2025
changed the title [-]P3500 R0 Are Contracts "safe"?[/-] [+]P3500 R0 Are Contracts "safe"?[/+] on Jan 14, 2025
added
infoInformational paper
and removed
infoInformational paper
on Jan 17, 2025
jfbastien

jfbastien commented on Feb 12, 2025

@jfbastien
Collaborator

Contracts were discussed in EWG in Hagenberg on Tuesday, see outcome here: #1648 (comment)

wg21bot

wg21bot commented on Mar 19, 2025

@wg21bot
CollaboratorAuthor

P3500R1 Are Contracts "safe"? (Timur Doumler, Gašper Ažman, Joshua Berne, Ryan McDougall)

changed the title [-]P3500 R0 Are Contracts "safe"?[/-] [+]P3500 R1 Are Contracts "safe"?[/+] on Mar 19, 2025
changed the title [-]P3500 R1 Are Contracts "safe"?[/-] [+]P3500 R1 Are Contracts "safe"?[/+] on Mar 19, 2025
jfbastien

jfbastien commented on May 26, 2025

@jfbastien
Collaborator

Timur told me: This paper (P3500R1) is purely informational and does not need to be scheduled in any WG21 subgroup. This issue can be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    EWGEvolutioncontractsContractsinfoInformational paper

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @jfbastien@cor3ntin@timuraudio@wg21bot

        Issue actions

          P3500 R1 Are Contracts "safe"? · Issue #2190 · cplusplus/papers