P2348 Whitespaces Wording Revamp

[wg21bot]

P2348R0 Whitespaces Wording Revamp (Corentin Jabot)

[jensmaurer]

Removing the CWG label while the paper is being processed by Study Groups.

[AaronBallman]

This does not need to be seen by SG22 -- I had originally thought there was a behavioral change here, but there isn't one (so any incompatibility between C and C++ in this space is an existing one).

[wg21bot]

P2348R1 Whitespaces Wording Revamp (Corentin Jabot)

[tahonermann]

SG16 reviewed P2348R0 during its August 25th, 2021 telecon. The following polls were taken.

Poll 1: Acknowledging that we have limited time available, we support the direction for P2348R0 and encourage further work.

• Attendance: 7
• No objections to unanimous consent

The author was advised to return with a revision containing wording based on P2314.

[tahonermann]

SG16 reviewed a draft of P2348R1 at its September 8th, 2021 telecon. The following polls were taken.

Poll 1: Prefer to use the term new-line rather than line-break in the whitespace grammar production.

• Attendance: 10

• SF	F	N	A	SA
  0	0	4	3	1

• No consensus for a change.

The author was advised to update the paper to address some wording concerns and then return to SG16.

[tahonermann]

SG16 reviewed a draft of P2348R2 at its September 22nd, 2021 telecon. The following polls were taken.

Poll 1: Forward D2348R2 to EWG as the recommended resolution of CWG2002 and CWG1655 and with a recommended ship vehicle of C++23.

• Attendance: 12

• SF	F	N	A	SA
  2	6	1	0	0

• Strong concensus in favor.

Removing the SG16 label; this paper is ready for EWG.