LWG closed issue [3033](https://wg21.link/LWG3033) as "NAD editorial", with a suggestion that changing the caption on the table would be both editorial and sufficient. The current caption is "`basic_string(const basic_string&)` effects" My first suggestion is: "`basic_string(const basic_string&)` and `basic_string(const basic_string&&)` effects", but I'm not going to insist on that. The discussion occurred on the -lib reflector in the thread titled "Issue 3033: basic_string move ctor is underspecified"