Skip to content

fs.op.canonical still defined in terms of absolute(p, base) #1620

Closed
@cubbimew

Description

@cubbimew

fs.op.canonical says it is equivalent to "absolute(p, base).", but absolute no longer takes a base argument as of p0492r2

More likely to be editorial, absolute still has a base argument in the synopsis of [fs.filesystem.syn], though it doesn't have it in [fs.op.absolute]

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    lwgIssue must be reviewed by LWG.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions