Skip to content

Format indexed variables with code and maths properly #1139

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
tkoeppe opened this issue Nov 28, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Format indexed variables with code and maths properly #1139

tkoeppe opened this issue Nov 28, 2016 · 6 comments
Assignees
@jensmaurer

Comments

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 28, 2016 •
edited
Loading

We still have a number of "indexed" variables, like Ti or TiD, that should be formatted with the variable name in code and the index in maths, either \tcode{T}$_i$ or $\mathtt{T}_i$ or $\mcode{T}_i$ provided someone adds an \mcode macro, or $\text{\tcode{T}}_i$.

Please also look out for concrete indexes like $T_0$ etc.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Nov 28, 2016
Merged
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkoeppe commented Nov 29, 2016

48efdfe contributed to this, but there's more work left to be done in [tuple.tuple].

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2016
Merged
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Waiting for #1142 to be applied to avoid merge conflicts.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Dec 13, 2016
Open
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkoeppe commented Dec 13, 2016

c214412 also contributed to this.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Dec 14, 2016
Closed
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Dec 15, 2016 •
edited
Loading

@tkoeppe: Do you have a suggestion how to format TiD = decay_t<Ti> ? My guess would be T_i^D = decay_t<T_i> (with appropriate font macros), but maybe you've got another idea.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkoeppe commented Dec 16, 2016 •
edited
Loading

@jensmaurer: How about TD_i = decay_t<T_i>? It's very unusual to have the index in the middle. Or maybe U_i, if that's available (I don't know which part you're looking at).

@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Dec 19, 2016
Closed
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2016
@jensmaurer
[utilities] Use $\mcode{T}_i$ for indexed types.
4fa8f38 
Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2016
@jensmaurer
Replace Ti with $\mcode{T}_i$ for proper indexes.
d3e0069 
And similar for Ui, Vi, and TiD; the latter becoming $\mcode{TD}_i$.

Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2016
@jensmaurer
[utilities] Use $\tcode{T}_i$ for indexed types.
3b3e8e3 
Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2016
@jensmaurer
Replace Ti with $\tcode{T}_i$ for proper indexes.
a31f5cd 
And similar for Ui, Vi, and TiD; the latter becoming $\tcode{TD}_i$.

Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Dec 20, 2016
@jensmaurer
Replace Ti with $\tcode{T}_i$ for proper indexes.
73d0d81 
And similar for Ui, Vi, and TiD; the latter becoming $\tcode{TD}_i$.

Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Dec 21, 2016
Merged
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Dec 21, 2016
@jensmaurer
[func.bind.bind] Reformat to use math-style indexing.
8b0e545 
Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
@jensmaurer jensmaurer mentioned this issue Dec 21, 2016
Merged
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2017
@jensmaurer
[func.bind.bind] Reformat to use math-style indexing.
662a7f1 
Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
zygoloid pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2017
@jensmaurer @zygoloid
[func.bind.bind] Reformat to use math-style indexing. (#1285)
e5674e1 
Partially addresses #1139.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2017
@jensmaurer
Replace Ti with $\tcode{T}_i$ for proper indexes.
d8c7462 
And similar for Ui, Vi, and TiD; the latter becoming $\tcode{TD}_i$.

Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
@zygoloid
Copy link
Member

zygoloid commented Nov 7, 2017

Any further problems can be addressed by point issues; having an omnibus issue is no longer valuable.

@zygoloid zygoloid closed this as completed Nov 7, 2017
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2017
@jensmaurer
Replace Ti with $\tcode{T}_i$ for proper indexes.
afbf43c 
And similar for Ui, Vi, and TiD; the latter becoming $\tcode{TD}_i$.

Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
jensmaurer added a commit to jensmaurer/draft that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2017
@jensmaurer
Replace Ti with $\tcode{T}_i$ for proper indexes.
9281212 
Partially addresses cplusplus#1139.
tkoeppe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2017
@jensmaurer @tkoeppe
Fix some more subscripts for T, also fix cv in a few places. (#1805)
ef9e312 
* Use \text{\cv}} in math mode, not \mathit.

* Replace Ti with $\tcode{T}_i$ for proper indexes.

Partially addresses #1139.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jensmaurer jensmaurer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@zygoloid @tkoeppe @jensmaurer