Skip to content

Add security rules for cookie settings and XML processing in YAML config #66

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

ESS-ENN
Copy link
Collaborator

@ESS-ENN ESS-ENN commented Dec 4, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced security rules for cookie settings and XML processing to enhance application security.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive test cases to validate secure cookie configurations and XML parsing behaviors related to DOCTYPE declarations.

These updates aim to strengthen security practices within your Java applications, ensuring safer handling of cookies and XML processing.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces new security rules in YAML configuration files for Java applications, focusing on cookie security and XML processing. It adds rules to detect insecure cookie settings and to manage DOCTYPE declarations in XML parsing, both categorized with a severity level of "warning." Additionally, corresponding test cases and snapshots are created to validate these rules, ensuring that the application adheres to secure coding practices.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rules/java/security/cookie-secure-flag-false-java.yml New rule added: id: cookie-secure-flag-false-java, pattern defined: $COOKIE.setSecure(false);
rules/java/security/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java.yml New rule added: id: documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java
tests/snapshots/cookie-secure-flag-false-java-snapshot.yml New snapshot added: id: cookie-secure-flag-false-java
tests/snapshots/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-snapshot.yml New snapshot added: id: documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java
tests/java/cookie-secure-flag-false-java-test.yml New test case added: id: cookie-secure-flag-false-java
tests/java/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-test.yml New test case added: id: documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • petrisorcoderabbit

🐰 In the land of code, where security's key,
New rules for cookies, as safe as can be.
With flags set just right, and XML in check,
We hop through the tests, avoiding the wreck.
So let’s keep our data, both safe and sound,
In this patch of joy, security's found! 🛡️


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Sakshis seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title @coderabbitai Add security rules for cookie settings and XML processing in YAML config Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
rules/java/security/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java.yml (1)

14-19: Enhance security references

The security note section could be strengthened by:

  1. Fixing the typo in "mproper" to "Improper" for CWE-611
  2. Adding specific CVE references for real-world XXE vulnerabilities
  3. Including a link to the OWASP XXE Prevention Cheat Sheet
-  [CWE-611]: mproper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference
+  [CWE-611]: Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference
   [OWASP A04:2017]: XML External Entities (XXE)
   [OWASP A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration]
   [REFERENCES]
       https://blog.sonarsource.com/secure-xml-processor
       https://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/features.html
+      https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/XML_External_Entity_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
+      https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=XXE+Java
tests/java/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-test.yml (2)

2-40: Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios

While the valid test cases are good, consider adding these scenarios for more comprehensive coverage:

  1. XMLReader configuration
  2. Chained builder creation and configuration
  3. Custom EntityResolver implementation
valid:
  # Existing cases...
+ - |
+    ParserConfigurationException {
+        XMLReader reader = XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader();
+        reader.setFeature("http://apache.org/xml/features/disallow-doctype-decl", true);
+    }
+ - |
+    ParserConfigurationException {
+        DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance()
+            .setFeature("http://apache.org/xml/features/disallow-doctype-decl", true)
+            .newDocumentBuilder()
+            .setEntityResolver(new CustomEntityResolver());
+    }
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 21-21: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 28-28: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 35-35: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


21-35: Fix trailing whitespace issues

There are trailing spaces on lines 21, 28, and 35 that should be removed for consistent formatting.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 21-21: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 28-28: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 35-35: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

tests/java/cookie-secure-flag-false-java-test.yml (1)

2-10: Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios

While the basic cases are covered, consider adding more test scenarios:

Valid cases:

  • Setting secure flag through a variable
  • Setting secure flag in constructor
  • Setting secure flag in builder pattern

Invalid cases:

  • Not setting secure flag at all
  • Setting secure flag through a false variable
  • Setting secure flag to false in different contexts (constructor, builder)
 valid:
   - |
     response.addCookie(cookie);
     cookie.setSecure(true);
     cookie.setHttpOnly(true);
     response.addCookie(cookie);
+  - |
+    boolean isSecure = true;
+    cookie.setSecure(isSecure);
+  - |
+    Cookie cookie = new Cookie("name", "value");
+    cookie.setSecure(true);
 invalid:
   - |
     cookie.setSecure(false);
+  - |
+    Cookie cookie = new Cookie("name", "value");
+    // Missing secure flag
+  - |
+    boolean isSecure = false;
+    cookie.setSecure(isSecure);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f95a8e and 606ee9b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • rules/java/security/cookie-secure-flag-false-java.yml (1 hunks)
  • rules/java/security/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/__snapshots__/cookie-secure-flag-false-java-snapshot.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/__snapshots__/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-snapshot.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/java/cookie-secure-flag-false-java-test.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/java/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-test.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/snapshots/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-snapshot.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
tests/java/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-test.yml

[error] 21-21: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 28-28: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 35-35: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
rules/java/security/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java.yml (1)

20-46: LGTM: Pattern matching logic is robust

The utility section correctly identifies the dangerous pattern of explicitly setting disallow-doctype-decl to false. The pattern matching is comprehensive and will catch both direct and chained method calls.

tests/java/documentbuilderfactory-disallow-doctype-decl-false-java-test.yml (1)

41-51: LGTM: Invalid test cases cover the core scenarios

The invalid test cases appropriately verify that setting disallow-doctype-decl to false is caught for both DocumentBuilderFactory and SAXParserFactory.

rules/java/security/cookie-secure-flag-false-java.yml (1)

4-12: LGTM! Clear and well-documented message

The message and documentation are clear, actionable, and include relevant security references (CWE-614 and OWASP).

tests/__snapshots__/cookie-secure-flag-false-java-snapshot.yml (1)

1-9: LGTM! Snapshot correctly captures the test case

The snapshot format is correct and properly labels the source code segment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants