Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TINKERPOP-3082] Allow specifying a customized Spark AppName #2634

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

ministat
Copy link

@ministat ministat commented Jun 4, 2024

It should allow overriding the Spark App name if user wants to. If user does not specify the Spark app name, we will provide the default one. This is useful for user to see different Spark App if there are many Gremlin Servers sharing the same Spark cluster.

@ministat ministat changed the base branch from master to 3.7-dev June 4, 2024 04:11
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.77%. Comparing base (9b46b67) to head (194d684).
Report is 123 commits behind head on 3.7-dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             3.7-dev    #2634      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      76.14%   76.77%   +0.62%     
- Complexity     13152    13189      +37     
=============================================
  Files           1084     1087       +3     
  Lines          65160    66324    +1164     
  Branches        7285     7293       +8     
=============================================
+ Hits           49616    50917    +1301     
+ Misses         12839    12693     -146     
- Partials        2705     2714       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kenhuuu
Copy link
Contributor

kenhuuu commented Jun 4, 2024

Could you also please add a short note to the CHANGELOG?

@kenhuuu
Copy link
Contributor

kenhuuu commented Jun 4, 2024

VOTE +1 pending minor fixes.

@vkagamlyk
Copy link
Contributor

VOTE+1

@Cole-Greer
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ministat, LGTM
VOTE +1

@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ This release also includes changes from <<release-3-6-7, 3.6.7>>.
* TINKERPOP-3021 Publish ARM64 Gremlin Console Images
* TINKERPOP-3030 Update to .NET 8
* TINKERPOP-3068 Make serviceName and mergedParams public for provider usage in CallStep
* TINKERPOP-3082 Allow specifying a customized Spark app name
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I should have been more specific. Please remove this and add something like Allow specifying a customized Spark app name to https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.7-dev/CHANGELOG.asciidoc?plain=1#L30

This "Improvements" section is automatically generated during release so it shouldn't be manually modified.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DONE

@kenhuuu
Copy link
Contributor

kenhuuu commented Jun 5, 2024

Sorry again for not being clear about where to add the CHANGELOG entry. After you move that line, I will merge this PR.

@ministat
Copy link
Author

ministat commented Jun 5, 2024

I have moved the description to the place you suggested. Please help verify it.

@kenhuuu
Copy link
Contributor

kenhuuu commented Jun 5, 2024

I have moved the description to the place you suggested. Please help verify it.

Yes, this is correct location, but it appears another change was committed to 3.7-dev to the CHANGELOG that caused a minor merge conflict in your PR. Do you mind updating this again?

It should allow override the Spark App name if user wants to. If user does not specify the Spark app name, we can provide the default one.
@ministat
Copy link
Author

ministat commented Jun 6, 2024

The conflict was fixed.

@kenhuuu kenhuuu merged commit 8d9f63c into apache:3.7-dev Jun 6, 2024
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants