Skip to content

Fix behaviour of empty .mbedignore #5315

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2017
Merged

Fix behaviour of empty .mbedignore #5315

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2017

Conversation

geky
Copy link
Contributor

@geky geky commented Oct 13, 2017

Should ignore nothing, currently ignores everything
An empty .mbedignore is easy to create when tinkering with a local repo

cc @marcuschangarm, @theotherjimmy

Should ignore nothing, currently ignores everything
An empty .mbedignore is easy to create when tinkering with a local repo
Copy link
Contributor

@theotherjimmy theotherjimmy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What a bug, what a fix.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Oct 18, 2017

/morph uvisor-test

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Oct 18, 2017

/morph build

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Oct 18, 2017

Build : SUCCESS

Build number : 236
Build artifacts/logs : http://mbed-os.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/?prefix=builds/5315/

Triggering tests

/morph test
/morph uvisor-test

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Oct 18, 2017

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Oct 19, 2017

AWS-CI uVisor Build & Test mbedos-5325 — Building...

The one below is the correct job for this one (the latest build). Ready

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit 8c7d36b into master Oct 19, 2017
@geky geky deleted the g-fix-empty-mbedignore branch November 7, 2017 17:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants