Skip to content

STM32 : add MCU_STM32L4P5xG and MCU_STM32L412xB support #15215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022

Conversation

jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Quick addition in order to help community to support NUCLEO-L412KB and NUCLEO-L4P5ZG

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Jan 28, 2022
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team January 28, 2022 13:30
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@jeromecoutant, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

;* opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0
;*
;*******************************************************************************
;* <<< Use Configuration Wizard in Context Menu >>>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could we get here SPDX identifier as well (other files have it) ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No... none of .S ST files have SPDX, as they are copied from ST github repo

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we request it upstream, it would be useful for projects.

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: work labels Feb 9, 2022
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Feb 9, 2022

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Feb 9, 2022

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit c6d814e into ARMmbed:master Feb 9, 2022
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Feb 9, 2022
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant deleted the PR_STM32L4_ADD branch February 14, 2022 09:16
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.16.0 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Jun 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants