Skip to content

STM32 : default SPI and I2C for targets with ARDUINO-NANO #15074

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2021
Merged

STM32 : default SPI and I2C for targets with ARDUINO-NANO #15074

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2021
+23 −0

Conversation

jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Fix #15069

Default SPI and I2C pins for arduino nano connectors were wrongly removed.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

Pull request type 

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results 

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2021
Closed
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant changed the title STM32 : default SPI anbd I2C for targets with ARDUINO-NANO STM32 : default SPI and I2C for targets with ARDUINO-NANO Sep 15, 2021
@0xc0170 0xc0170 added needs: CI release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch labels Sep 28, 2021
0xc0170
0xc0170 previously approved these changes Sep 28, 2021
View reviewed changes
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Sep 28, 2021

CI started

@mergify mergify bot added the needs: work label Sep 28, 2021
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 28, 2021

This PR cannot be merged due to conflicts. Please rebase to resolve them.

@mergify mergify bot removed the needs: CI label Sep 28, 2021
@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Sep 28, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This PR cannot be merged due to conflicts. Please rebase to resolve them.

Done

@mergify mergify bot dismissed 0xc0170’s stale review September 28, 2021 11:24

Pull request has been modified.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Sep 28, 2021

CI restarted

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Sep 28, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 2 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit d5d6688 into ARMmbed:master Sep 29, 2021
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Sep 29, 2021
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant deleted the PR_L432 branch September 29, 2021 14:32
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.15.1 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Nov 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@0xc0170 0xc0170 0xc0170 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
release-version: 6.15.1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

I2C_SDA and I2C_SCL removed from NUCLEO_L432KC
4 participants
@jeromecoutant @0xc0170 @mbed-ci @mbedmain