Skip to content

STM32WB: enable QSPI for custom boards #14392

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2021

Conversation

jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

QSPI is supported by STM32WB MCU,
but was not implemented yet in mbed-os as there is no STM32WB target with embedded QSPI.

Support is now available for custom boards.

mbed_app.json example:

{
  "target_overrides": {
    "CUSTOM_BOARD": {
      "target.device_has_add": ["QSPI"],
      "target.components_add" : ["QSPIF"],
      "drivers.qspi_io0": "PX_x",
...
      "drivers.qspi_csn": "PX_x"
    }
  }
}

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Mar 8, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team March 8, 2021 16:30
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

ciarmcom commented Mar 8, 2021

@jeromecoutant, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Mar 9, 2021
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 9, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Mar 9, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants