Skip to content

Add bare metal support to freescale targets #14291

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 2, 2021

Conversation

harmut01
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of changes

Add bare metal support to the following targets: K22F, K66F, K82F, KL25Z, KL43Z, and KL46Z. Remove any deprecated compiler dependencies.

Impact of changes

None

Migration actions required

None

Documentation

None


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers


@harmut01 harmut01 requested review from hugueskamba and a team February 16, 2021 11:43
@hugueskamba hugueskamba requested a review from a team February 16, 2021 11:50
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Feb 16, 2021
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@harmut01, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@harmut01 harmut01 force-pushed the baremetal_freescale branch from 6e35a66 to 5b8bdf8 Compare February 17, 2021 11:23
@harmut01
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hugueskamba, @LDong-Arm this force-push removes references to IAR and fixes the scatter file.

@harmut01 harmut01 force-pushed the baremetal_freescale branch from 5b8bdf8 to b265ae8 Compare February 17, 2021 12:01
@mergify mergify bot dismissed hugueskamba’s stale review February 17, 2021 12:01

Pull request has been modified.

Copy link
Contributor

@LDong-Arm LDong-Arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Feb 17, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the stale Stale Pull Request label Feb 19, 2021
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

This pull request has automatically been marked as stale because it has had no recent activity. @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers, please start CI to get the PR merged.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 1, 2021

CI started

1 similar comment
@adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

adbridge commented Mar 1, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Mar 1, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants