HAL I2C: adds missing DEVICE_I2C guards

[maciejbocianski]

This PR adds missing DEVICE_I2C guards to I2C hal implementations
These guards are essential when one wants to disable i2c hal implementation for specific targets

Pull request type

[X] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

@jamesbeyond
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-hal

Release Notes

[ciarmcom]

@maciejbocianski, thank you for your changes.
@toyowata @maclobdell @ashok-rao @bentcooke @MarceloSalazar @jamesbeyond @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

[jamesbeyond]

LGTM

[adbridge]

@maciejbocianski shouldn't this actually be going to the i2c branch so that #10374 will build or do you intend to rebase the i2c branch once this goes to master ?

[maciejbocianski]

@adbridge Exactly, my intention was to rebase the feature branch after this goes to master. This changes can be helpful in the future, and who knows when the i2c_feature will be merged

[adbridge]

@adbridge Exactly, my intention was to rebase the feature branch after this goes to master. This changes can be helpful in the future, and who knows when the i2c_feature will be merged

Then you will need to do that rebase in order for #10374 to pass :)

[0xc0170]

CI started

[0xc0170]

Aborted the job unfortunately as we have to reschedule one possibly rc4 PR.
We will restart this one once it is in.

[mbed-ci]

Test run: FAILED

Summary: 4 of 7 test jobs failed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

Failed test jobs:

• jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_mbed2-build-GCC_ARM
• jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-ARM
• jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-GCC_ARM
• jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-IAR

[0xc0170]

Ci restarted

[mbed-ci]

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 11 of 11 test jobs passed
Build number : 2
Build artifacts