BLE: fix missing implementation call #10340
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@paul-szczepanek-arm, thank you for your changes. |
0xc0170
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2019
|
CI started |
Test run: FAILEDSummary: 1 of 9 test jobs failed Failed test jobs:
|
|
was also missing default implementation |
|
CI started |
Test run: SUCCESSSummary: 13 of 13 test jobs passed |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is a straightforward fix - missing function definition that calls the implementation. All calls are indirect and this function was already declared but never defined causing link error. This fixes it.
Pull request type
Reviewers
@donatieng
Release Notes