ENG.. - Traitement de 7 Zones Marécageuses - R0

Télécharger au format docx, pdf ou txt
Télécharger au format docx, pdf ou txt
Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

RN1 : PK24-PK105, SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

PK 24+000 to PK 40+200 (SEGMENT-2)

COMPLIANCES OF SEG-2_SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS REPORT SWAMPY AREA


Comments IE Contractor
General The methodology for the study of swampy areas should Noted, we have already provide
observation incorporate the following factors The geometry geological conditions, morphology,
s (morphology, profiles) of the slope, profiles in the submitted report.
The geological conditions, the distribution of the different Other details are incorporated in the
layers, the presence of accidents… revised report in annexure-VI.
The geotechnical parameters of the different terrains,
The hydrogeological conditions making it possible to
determine the position of any groundwater present or
the sources of water, type of supply, order of magnitude
of permeability, etc.
The objective is to build a geotechnical model of the site, Noted, it is incorporated in the revised
characterized by one (or more) geotechnical section(s) report in annexure-IX
clearly showing the mechanical characteristics of the
terrain. This has not been provided/detailed for each
marshland area.
With regard to the program of geotechnical
investigations, the Company the depths of the SPT
surveys are limited to 5m deep locally to 7m for the
marshy area of PK 36+980. This depth is not sufficient to
propose solutions for the treatment of marshy areas. In
addition, the boreholes indicate areas of low resistance
on the depth investigated. The results of the excavations
appended to the document correspond to the results of
the reconnaissance excavations of the supporting soil, the
depth of which is generally limited to one meter. We also
note the absence of identification tests and no
geotechnical sections were provided in the report.
The profile of the PK 40+100 (LHS) shows a surface and/or The profile with properly zoomed
slip circle outside the limits of the terrain model. Is the model, it’s incorporated for better
slip circle drawn manually? representation of the slip circle.

The Builder is called upon to justify the resistance Noted, it is incorporated in the revised
parameters attributed to the various materials. 6. Backfill report in table-5
profiles should be checked for punching.
RN1 : PK24-PK105, SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS

PK 24+000 to PK 40+200 (SEGMENT-2)


It is stated in the report that for the analysis, the The rock fill is completely cohesion less as raw
sample, also in stage-1 we are considering
cohesiveness and friction angle of the armourstone cohesionless, however in the stag-2 the rock fill
material were taken as 30 KPa and 25 degrees will be sink in the soft soil during the filling. Due
respectively based on our experience. This is not true, to this the voids of the rockfill will get filled with
rockfill is non-cohesive material. the cohesive soil with time, thus creating a
composite of rockfill & cohesive soil. This
composite will exhibit both cohesion & angle of
friction as considered in analysis.

The detailed recognition program is to be updated as


mentioned above. The survey layout plan and calculation
methods will be revised accordingly.
Noted, its incorporated in the revised
report
The Builder is invited to carry out the necessary
verifications on the basis of geotechnical investigations
adapted and oriented for the stability calculation and to
carry out the work in accordance with the duly justified
plans and this in accordance with the specifications
required by the Employer Part III 02: specifications of
performances – Clause 2.4.2 Earthworks “ln the case of
the creation or resumption of embankment or
excavation, the Contractor carries out geotechnical
surveys adapted to the context, to carry out a stability
study and to put in place constructive measures ensuring
the stability of the development over time”.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi