Mesures de Performance Ajustée Au Risque Résumé
Mesures de Performance Ajustée Au Risque Résumé
Mesures de Performance Ajustée Au Risque Résumé
Mesures de
Performance
Ajustes du
Risque
Daniel HERLEMONT
Le Ratio de Sharpe
La mesure de performance (ajuste du risque)
la plus utilise
Rappel:
Page 1
1
Rendement
Rf
Risque / Volatilit
Daniel HERLEMONT
le ratio de Treynor
R rf
L'Alpha de Jensen
R r f = + ( RM rf )
normalement alpha=0
L'information ratio
alpha/trackingError
Page 2
2
M2
Daniel HERLEMONT
M2 Measure: Example
Hypothetical Portfolio:
30/42 = .714 in P (1-.714) or .286 in T-bills
(.714) (.35) + (.286) (.06) = 26.7%
Since this return is less than the market, the managed
portfolio underperformed
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 3
3
Treynor Measure
R p rf
p
rp = Average return on the portfolio
rf = Average risk free rate
p = Weighted average for portfolio
Daniel HERLEMONT
L'alpha de Jensen
p= rp - [ rf + p ( rm - rf) ]
p = Alpha for the portfolio
rp = Average return on the portfolio
p = Weighted average Beta
rf = Average risk free rate
rm = Avg. return on market index port.
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 4
4
L'Information Ratio
Rp = p + p Rb + ep
avec
Rp = rendement du portefeuille
p = alpha du portefeuille
p = beta du portefeuille reelatif au benchmark
Rb = les rendements du benchmark
ep = les rsidus
Information Ratio = p / (ep)
en donnes annualises
refrence: "Active Portfolio Management" Grinold
Daniel HERLEMONT
Percentile
Information Ratio
90
1.0
75
0.5
50
0.0
25
-0.5
10
-1
Page 5
5
Information Ratio
Information Ratio et Ratio de Sharpe
SharpeRatio2 = SharpeRatioBenchmark2 + InformationRatio2
Treynor Black
D'un autre cote, si un avantage infime suffit tre class parmi les
meilleurs, il sera difficile de distinguer le talent de la chance ...
Daniel HERLEMONT
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 6
6
1/6
-1%
-1%
1/2
1%
1%
1/3
2%
11%
mu sigma sharpe
1% 1% 1
4% 5% .8
L'actif B possde un Sharpe plus faible que celui de A, alors que B est
clairement prfrable A (dominance stochastique).
En passant de 2 11, l'cart type augmente plus vite que l'esprance.
Daniel HERLEMONT
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 7
7
p = probabilite de gain G
1 p = probabilit de perte << G
E = (1 p ) + pG
2 = (1 p ) 2 + pG 2 ( (1 p ) + pG )2
= p(1 p )(G )
sharpe =
(1 p ) + pG
p
1 p
p(1 p ) (G )
p = 0.1
sharpe 0.33
Daniel HERLEMONT
f (x) =
2/x3
0
si x 1
si x < 1
Page 8
8
Daniel HERLEMONT
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 9
9
L'indice de Stutzer
IP = 12 Sharpe2
La stratgie A est
prfrable B
car elle permet
probablement
de surperformer le
benchmark plus
rapidement
que la stratgie B
Daniel HERLEMONT
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 10
10
Performance Attribution
Decomposing overall performance into components that are
related to specific elements of performance
Asset allocation decision
Market timing
Up and Down Markets
Daniel HERLEMONT
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 11
11
(2)
(3)
(4)
Index
return
(5)=(3) (4)
contribution to
Market
weight
weight
weight
performance
Stocks
0.7
0.6
0.1
5.81%
0.581%
Bonds
0.07
0.3
-0.23
1.45%
-0.3335%
Cash
0.23
0.1
0.13
0.48%
0.0624%
(2)
0.3099%
(3)
(4)
(5)=(3) (4)
Portfolio
contribution to
weight
performance
Market
return
return
Stocks
7.28
5.81
1.47
0.7
1.03%
Bonds
1.89
1.45
0.44
0.07
0.03%
1.06%
Daniel HERLEMONT
Appraisal Ratio
eA
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 12
12
E ( rm ) rf A
eA
2
2
P
CAL
E(r)
P
CML
A (active)
M (market: passive)
Rf
Daniel HERLEMONT
(rp-rf)/
p > (rm-rf)/
p
P is the portfolio that combines the passively managed portfolio
with the actively managed portfolio
The combined efficient frontier has a higher return for the same
level of risk
Daniel HERLEMONT
Page 13
13