Panzer Biitz,.
bel ed i
RS Re a ge Oeay ysws0N ave 4 1ewon
av sen 4 1ew0N av a1gn00
SdoLTIH
34018
20008 Iv 3
saNog
foyoued ,6uie0, 0v) ee HWSO 581804,
ouoawauis
meta, | oemmwimiw
(SeeAeH Burpr|ou)
SaTOIHBAGaNOMNY
4A9UVL4O 3dAL
(pena 6apapuy
‘suaHioTY
anon NON 2 mon oes
aut
oniaa
Noavamn
js0ssv719
BAva1 oF aw
saaawv:
yo! ep Suayoene or 4 PRY
savin
sdouri
3ONVUO MOUS
ON oot
NON BONvO NMOUS
s3g01s
sp susyaene oF suo Poy
30P%
amor ot s9ia3603
au
snmon
amon om
1B e10N 08
Boon eS
BONvUO NMOUS 7
savow
‘sa01770H s340718 73A77 aNnoHD
NON
uvano
NO Si 1394Vi N3HM 3UI4-JO-3NIT SHI 19nH1SBO
HOIHN S108WAS 3015 XBH/3TOV1SEO DNINSANINE
ainessy es013—peNY
tunusag—peny feuoy 294 Pine syoee
Tujenai uenBe vo on DNIGNSISO)
'3SN3I30 NO 193433
_
= |ee acim > fae = Bi =
raat
‘SOllwa SAO
oneuejdxa
a18VLSLINSaY LvaWoo
sunivasNivuwaLFr 8 project of this type the list of source
publications is quite small. The type of data
Considered “popular”. The two bes sources
are US Army intaligonce publistions‘ewed
during 1945. They contain the result of four
yoor's work in gathering data on the Russian
nd Gorman ormice, This data mae obtained
{tom captured documents (frm the Germans)
‘and. information provided by the Rustons
Much of the Russion ata could. be
authenticated by using documents captured
from the Germans (who in turn had captured
tham from the Rumians). These two manls
(IME_E 30451 HANDBOOK ON GERMAN
MILITARY FORCES end TM. 20-420
HANDBOOK | ON USSR MILITARY
FORCES), coch containing over 600 page,
ferces (with the excoption of weepont in the
USSR "mancall Organization, cacti,
‘equipment, taining are all covered in detail
fsthough you must be careful to keepin in
that these manuale wore published in
somewhat of & hurry and that mistakes did
fccur, But overall they were lvaluable, For
the larger aspects of the wer one had to sor
to “official” historic, ‘Noithor “Russa. nor
Germany have, in the American sense, sctully
poblisned an’ "official history” yet. The
Russians published, between 1960 and 1963.
ISTORIVA VELIKOY "OTCHESTVENNOY
VOYNY SOVETSKOYO SOYUZE {'The
Soviet Union"). It contained. many, many
“official” history wes being prepared, the
Prime Minister of the USSR. Using ths sores
fof tx volumes fe like vaking on a minefield
Instead of a mine detoctor you nesd 2 "BS.
etector”, for these volumes contain’ much
that can be described no other way. However,
ft does contain some “hard” data se well a 8
tetions. If you ee either vigorous or deaperate
Shortly after the publication ofthis erie an
‘ssially” 9 word for word translation with a
bit of editing On the German se there isnot
official” history. There i, honever, available
he KRIEGSTAGBUCH. DES
OBERKOMMANDOS DER WEHRMACHT
(Wor Diary of the Armed Forces High
Command). This" multivolume set wes
published between 1981 and 1986. 1 containe
24
the actual “operational” documents of the
Geman High Command during. the wer
‘ecthe Russian volumes it does contain much
Sreter volume of useful data,” Further
Tuchnical” data on weapons and operations
ware obtained fom FM TOMO} STAFF
OFFICERS’ "FIELD. MANUAL
ORGANIZATION, TECHNICAL AND.
LOGISTICAL DATA, and. the following
Gaman language publications: DIE
DEUTSCHEN PANZER 1926-1946 (F. M, von
Senger und Etter, 1965), DIE
PANZERGRENADIERE (F. M. von Senger
und Etterin, 1961), DIE DEUTSCHEN
GESCHUTZE 1990-1045 (Bohm, Kosar etal
1950), DIE ARMEEN DER OSTBLOCK
STAATEN (F. Wiener, 1967: this supplied
ff which re still in usa, | have notes taken
fram Department of Defense publications of
Russian WWII semomant|, KAMPEPANZER
1916-1966 (F. M. von Senger and Ettertn,
1986), DIE ROTEN PANZER (Andronikov
and Mostonenko, 1963, « Germen translation
ereral history of the "war in the eam” was
Focontly published by the American Office of
{he Chief of Military History: STALINGRAD
TO BERLIN: THE GERMAN DEFEAT IN
THE EAST (Gar! Ziomke, 1968). Iti the fist
the Russo-German vir, It gies a good reviow
of the frst two Years of the war plus more
particular use were articles published in such
Imogazines az" the FIELD. ARTILLERY
JOURNAL, ARMOR end INFANTRY.
unmentioned here) provided "mainly
‘confirming oF supplementary dats ta the titles
though “microfilm reproduction from the
Drobebly atl in print for oven in paperbeck)
tne any book seller worth his eat should be
able fo run them dowm for you should you be
hers obviously not exhouste. It has not
been given t0 ether impress You OF to prod
You in tho direction of historical rossaren, The
Imai function of WHERE ‘THE
INFORMATION CAME FROM was jue that,
10 show you that the data presented in ths
Siwavs been around. I's just @ matter of
Fearanging it to suit your needs. That's what
Iistorians are for
Designers Notes &
elle LO
BUT
OM ed
OUT
Ss
a)Copyright 1970, The Avalon Hill Company, Baltimore, Md
Designer's Notes
A glance “atthe PANZERBLITZ come
components gives You the impresion that you
‘can. pick up 9” considerable amount. of
Fistorial date by just studying the game,
‘uch less actully playing it, There i 9 certain
mount of truth to this, for 9 considerable
‘amount of historical data was incorporated
into. the components of | the game
Unforwnarsiy, you cannot tke this data, 3s
modified in the game design, at face valve
Instead you must understand some of the
decisions’ that were made about this ate
before it wes Incorporetod into the game
‘Take, for example, the “factors” assigned to
‘he unit in the game, Speed and ange factors
‘wore relatively easy to compute. The “scale
‘of the gine is such that ech “hexagon
‘measures. 250. meter. scross. Each "turn
fale about six minutes, For speed ll we
heeded 10 know was the top speed of the
Vehicle andthe horsepower to weight rato
‘Ateady we can se that 9 “simplification” was
performed at this point, as some vehicles
fhould have had special restrietione placed on
them bocaisy of a very low horsepower to
‘weight ratio. But t0 do this would havo addea
Sil more “drt” 10 the mochanies of the game
Te ig lite “simplifications” Tike this wich
spall the difference between a playable game
fad an unplayable one. Rules covering the
fiferences in horsepower 1 weight ratios
ware tested end found t0 add little to the
‘me, had ther effect born decisive such rules
‘Wout ave Boon Kept.
Computing the range factors was somewhat
‘more complex. Considerable data was evelable
fon the range and effectiveness of the various
igh velocity gins used in the game
(particularly on the tanks). What was not
generally Known vas the copablitis of the
fighting equipment on these guns. When this
Sata ves considered it was found to reduce the
‘ange of same weapons considerably. This was
Derticulary true for the Fussans, who. in
‘general had optical sighting equipment inferior
fo" the German’ devices In addition tho
Germans would mount antisivraft type
‘optical equipment on certain antitank gun
(Gavally the 88rm guns) which wore well
itd fr long rang fir. The same restrictions
‘vere. applied’ to all types of weapons. In
‘sddition, the generally acsopted tactics anc
taining had. to be considered also. Certain
‘weapons were simply not employed at extrame
anges, although they wer capable of it. This
Uataly applied to Rustin “A clas weapons
(euch as 122mm howitzer.
‘The above range factor had an important
bearing on the computation of tho "attack"
factor” Sut more important were such factors
‘8 weapons effoctivenoss, ammunition supply,
‘roe traning and tactical doctrine. Usually ne
‘eociate 2 weapon's effoctweness wath (ite
‘more than the data on the size of shell and
what it ean do, But the ie only a part of i
“The rate of fire is important (most German
{anke had a power traverse for ther surrey, a8
dd MOST Ruston tenks, but the Rusion
System was more. primitive and subject 10
breakdown) and tht is dependent not only on
‘such thinge as the design of the gun and
‘whether oF aot it has power traverse in the
turret but algo on the size of the ammunition
larger sizes, ike 122mm and 128mm care in
two parts), Crew training and the general
fedvcational level of the crows had an
Important’ bearing on this aso, as did the
quality and avalibiity of radio equipment
Wor example, Soviet tanks used an AM radio
while the Germans used a more offiient FM
fe. Throughout mos of the war only one
Soviet tank in tn Pad 2 fadio weil all Gorman
‘ones did. German radios were simplar and
{sasir to maintain although by the end of the
‘var some” 30% of Soviet radios were of the
fmore efficient American type (we also. sent
the ‘Soviets some five milion radio. tubes
‘daring the war) By now you should be abla
see how important the usually “unrecognized”
tale a0 in ovslating unit's effectiveness
(Overall, you could say shet the unit’s attack
factor ‘mas_mainly” a function of the
ponotration of the gun's shell But we mast
tso consider the other factors mentioned.
‘Depending on the weapon being evaluated the
other factor’ effect may very. Each woapon
had to be evaluated indivcvally. In adaition
the turrotles tanks (aeiault- gute) hod to be
hada with particular care, fr their lock ofa
fotating turret was pertiularly important In an
Dffenshe situation. In this caso the
‘manouverabiity and tactical doctrine played a
decisive rate,
For the other types of weapons (Hand M
cls) an overriding. factor was. ammunition
fupply. One rearon for the short number of
ture. in-the game situations i due to the
fmmunition limitations which actually oxsted
Sand was crually the couse of a battle being
Terminated. Each weapon had. an assigned
‘unit of fea” ae usualy cari that number
‘of rounes into stion, though more than on
lint of fire would be carted Into different
‘types. of action (two or tras for offensive
‘Operations, Ine for defense of 8 quit sector).
‘The German unit of Fire was invariably lxgerthan the Russian. For example, the Germans
‘cried 690 rounds for ach SMG while the
‘Russians caried only 300. German 120mm
rrortars each had 150 rounds (4 tone) while
tach Russian one hod 80 rounds (2.2 tons.
German G's had 3450 to 6200 rounds while
Fussan ones hed 800 to 2500, Of course, thi
vas one reeson why German units usually hac
mmore transport inthe units. It lap the
Iajor reason why German weapons of eal
faliber to Russian ones have 9 higher combat
foesoe
“The weapons class system and the Weapons
Effect Chart point up. another important
foctor which hae slresdy beon covered stove,
If you haven’s already noticed It. Obvious.
‘antitank ("A lass) "woapont are most
fective against armored vehicles. One shel
Suil knockout a tank. vt against comething
Tike ‘infantry (which’ has amore highly
‘developed sanse of sf preservation than do
the inenimate tenks) one shell would. have
Tittle fect. Infact, armor piercing
‘ammunition would have no effect stall unless
actually hit aman. Tanks also earied high
‘oplosive (°H cls) shell (ap well = other
‘types, for example, the Gorman StGIN usually
carried 22 rounds of armor plering sll, 27
founds of HE and 5 rounds of smake shal)
isapone such 6 the 120mm mortar usually
carried only HE. This sell could not knock
fut tanke directly, but shell landing on oF
‘rear’ a tank could sabia it (usually by
‘damaging the running gear, tusret or engine).
[As our game situations are too short for repairs
to be made, this litle amount of damage
tftetivaly pts the tank ‘out of action. HE
‘hell, which upon exploding releases hundreds
(of motal fragments, is most effective against
‘armored weapons and infranty, Most ofthe
‘damage is done by either injuring the men oF
feauipment or, almost az important, by
“disrupting” the organization of the unit. Tt
was found that @ unit coming under fie would
Often be 0 disrupted es to be totally
Inatteetve for hours. Thi i often what "X"
‘and "D” outcomes on the combat result table
indicate
‘The defense factors were somewhat easier 10
compute than the attack factors. Defense
‘depended on two primary factors: cover and
‘coneaaimont. ‘The fist of thoes was, for
‘exmored vehicles, simply armor and how thick
it was. For othor typos of targets it depended
fon. "disporsion”, This applied very well to
“alsperse” hengolt ae soon 96. the shooting
started. Other types of weapons could alse
benefit from this factor, depending on how
4
‘mobile they were. The second facto
Concealment, was similar to dispersion. alt
primarily with how small unit was, or how
"anctaled” it normally was while operating.
Certain weapons, such a antiaircraft guns,
tere dificult to conceal while im plac {lke
the tube pointed "up". Othar hoavy weapons
Varied in their “conesalment™ Tector In
Felotion to thir sco.
(One further complication is that we have three
basi typoe of DIFFERENT units in tho game
bach te cifferent in decisive ways, making eat:
type of unit bascally incompatible with the
other. The fst type isthe Infantry, and its
Sexociated heavy weapons (machine guns,
‘mortars, infantry howitzors and, to linited
batent. antitank guns). Ths type. i rte
ierent from th original masaoe of firearm
fequiped men raliod over three hundred years
farlior, All weapons are clract fire and all
‘Operate, more or less, within sight of each
‘thar. ‘The next type ie. armored fighting
‘ohicles, While tesa weapons were originally
‘evloped for daaliog with infantry ‘heavy
‘weapons, they hea now grovn 80 potent that
thir main tak was to destroy each other (or
‘enemy artillry, tha third type of weapon!
Matters were farther complicated by” the
prosenca of numerous antrtank weapons inthe
hands of the infnery. These not only included
‘gine of vorious caliber, but also antisane
‘Reapens that wore portable enough for uso by
antitank rifle [145mm which they continued
to iawe in lage numbers throughout the war
hilo the. Germans had, from 1943 on, an
‘xcallent sores ol ant-tank rockets (similar to
the US "bazooka ). True, the tanks could stil
"overrun" the in’antry using fittle more than
imachineguns and their wn imposing bulk. But
basicaly the tanks tock care of the tanks whila
the heavy weapons took care of the infancy
Thich tied to take caro of isl. The third
clase of weapons wes really @ "type" all by
Itai.” The atilory depended envicoly on
frepower. The arilery batteries depicted in
‘the game are secend ony tothe infantry unite
in the sumer of mon they contain. All this
Just to keep the shells going into the cannon,
Fr example, 2 Soviet 122mm battory cari
found with 18 tons of ammunition
(compared t0 55 tone for a itl company)
Establishing workable relationships between
these threo “quie differant “types” was
{ecomplished through 9 ares of wil and error
toss of vanous approaches to the game. You
just keep looking until you find the one that
{bles and otter such collcted data on
‘reapons effectiveness. These were pplied
‘anere appropriate. But since wo had to
calculate ammunition expenditures £0. that
tach weapon would, theoretically, be able to
fire nearly every turn of the game, these
‘rious destruction tables had to be modifies
Considerably. And, of cours, the lament of
hanes had to bo added els, it wount al that
‘complicated, there was just 9101 of work and
petty detail to be attanced 0,
‘To try and tle all the above together let ut
once more review the weapon's class system.
"A" clase weapons ae PRIMARILY. armor
piercing shall" fired. fom ether armored
Vehicles or non-mobile antitank gun ‘These
weapons are alo supplied with HE (High
Explosive) shel for uso against infantry and
‘other nor-ormored targets. In addition, the
[rmunition supply of tanks is limited. Ae a
‘Compensation of sorts the armored vehicle has
the dubious advantoge of being sie to stand in
‘he “open” and fro from the most favorable
position. When operating aginst non-armored
Targets these weapons. are naturally ata
isedvantage due to lack of ammunition (at
‘nel as the proper type." class weapons are
‘mainly the SMG ard machinoguns of the
Infantry’ Iplus han grenades and small
mortars). Rifles and pistols ore not ‘ally
counted 36 during the Second World War they
layed a very minor role as casualty causing
fagonts (a ow porcent at mort). These infantry
‘weapons, a0" well "at the infantrymen
Themselves, were most effective at vory close
ranges, Their main problem wae t0 got that
Close to the enemy without being destroyed in
the provers." and ™M cle wespone were
practically identical in that both fired aa HE
(High: Explosive) shell. These weapont had
much greater range than "I" land often "A"?
lass weapons. But their accuracy also daclined
‘their rango increas thus reducing thelr
tfetivenss
‘The board provides its own explanation forthe
ymbolization vsti on it Most of Rusts at
ovoid of any large. levations beyond those
shown on he board. Many areas di, however,
contain numerous gules (often inthe form of
Sraambed) whieh provided terain problems
‘of a different kind. The player who negloets to
keep an eve on these depressions may have
probleme mith hie coponer
“The movement syste i fomowhat uneelitie.
Movement shouldbe simultansous, ut sich @
system would be too dificult to reproduce in
{playable game. However, the present sytem
‘eolistic movement system. First of al, you
can't. move AND fire in
reverts many une
this rule changot the ontire “complexion” of
the game. For example, if force moves up
100 Close t0 enemy units it exposes self to
lnomy attack. As long as you Blok roads and
"easy" approsches to your own units your
opponent will sways have to plan one move
‘head. All this because you cannot move and
fire nthe same tur,
‘A FEW NOTES ON TACTICS
If you haven't already figured it out for
Yourselt, this game i primarily concerned with
‘Enall unit tactics. IF you want t0 get anything
{ut of the geme, if you vant t0 lesen ow 10
play it wal you had otter kop your mind on
Tactics. Is what the game is all about,
“The sale ofthe game (1:12200) can be given
‘one hexagon = 250 meters (measured from
fone side to another). In generel, the tactice
finally adopted by ‘both sider” conformed
remarkably” well to the advantages ond
linvtations inherent to the various units and
\wmapone ivalved. The Garment, for the most
bart, had superior taining and weapons on
‘er eke, Thoir traning was better thought
jut and more thorough in its epolication. The
‘outcome of ail this wat that the average
Germon_ small unit could “think for itl”
German weapon wore designed with thi in
mind. The suporirity of Garman weapons wat
‘ot absolute, or even pronounced, much of the
‘ime. Usuaiy it was just a matter of tho
German oops being able to do things most
Fussians simply were not tained to do. An
excellent land widespread) example. canbe
{ourd in German signal ane optical equipment.
Whon ovailablo (although it wos aleve
authorized “on paper") most German platoon
Size units were equipped with a radio. Russian
adios (of inferior construction most
{Gorman models) were not uually found below
battalion level (except. in. armored. unite
Optical ‘equipment as decisive in. armored
vehicles, Germany's optics industry was the
‘most eevanced in the world end their high
‘oloity guns and ertilry were more accurate
41 longer ranges as 8 result. The combination
‘of more highly trainod porsonnel, beter signals,
and optical equipment also made the German
artillery coneicerebly more efficient than the
Russian. It also made the German artillery the
backbone of thelr defensive tatics You can
xsi sce this ia the game. ‘The Wespe and
Hommel SP guns were more important than
‘you would think from reading most accounts
[And then thee f the bread and butter aspects
fof defenge. The following defense frontages
5‘are given in PANZERBLITZ hexagons (each
‘Savaling 250 mater). GERMAN: Platoon
$2 hones, Company = 2-4 nexes. Battalion =
138 hexes. Regiment ~ 6-12 hexes. Division =
Dado hexes, Unit in question i tho. "44
infantry division, Motorized unite were not
hormally used for defense, if they. were
Cnusly Only the infantry unite were putin the
ling. RUSSIAN: Company = 1-2_hexes.
Battalion = 42 hexes, Regiment = 1224
hhexes, Division = 37-72 hexes. Again, the unit
ie tho rifle division. One readily apparent
Giference between German and Russian
Sefensive doctrine fs the Russian practice of
“expending” rifle divisions inthe defence
‘Almost al their strength was “up Front” while
{he Garman unit wae deoloved in more doth,
‘This was due to the greotr Germen rllance on
their veety superior aruilery. The. Russians
tlso usd artillery inthe defense, but usually in
shorter range "direct fre” application.
Offensive fromtagos wore usually half of the
Cefensive frontages. In ths case the Russians
{did use dopth. A regimane would attack on 3
frontage of 2-5 hexes, a dvision on a frontage
ff 4-70 hexes. The Russane also ved heavily
Feinforced exsult teams, Tanks, SP guns and
thor artillery units, as well at combat
engineers, wore added to the attacking rifle
ues. This was normally done (when possibe)
‘ven in “mobile” situations. Although, in casos
Iie this, motorized ile units were usolly the
‘only. ones available. and thero unite were
normally supplied with “reinforcing” units.
When clearly defined frontages were in effect
it was usually because there were so many
{tisndly unite inaction that to ignore nit
boundaries would hrm you more. than it
\weuld help. Thus some of the PANZERBLITZ
Stations using the long narrow board
covfiguration. accurately portray. this. In
“ooen” situations there is stl the aspect of
‘tvontage” if only because the mobile unit
aroncing is usually headed for a clearly
Se'ined geonraonica objective (particulary in
the caso ofthe Fusions, who did not have the
Sophisticated radio nes or command stats 10
‘low for quick changes in plan),
FRathor than go on with 9 ist of tactical “do's
land dont’s” it would be better to advise you
‘develop your own. The gamo is accurate
fnough t@ allow you to use the tactics ofthe
‘Orginal batts in order 10 be successful After
1 ew gomer you should be on your way to
eyeloping your oem tactics, or at least the
‘om that sult you best.
ANOTE ON.
‘THE UNIT COUNTER PROFILES
‘Almost al ofthe vohiulaesihowotts used on
the counters are in constant scale with each
ther. The Wagons and Rustin Cavalry
Shown in slighty large seale to maximize
Fecognition. Certain extremely large vehicles
fare shown in a sightly smaller scale (They are
pie V, JodP2 VI, Tiger It, SU-100, JSU-122,
4-85, J! and SII) S00 the profiles in the
Campaign Analysis booklet for strictly
securate veual ize comparison
Experimental Games
EXPANDED GAME
‘Combine two oF more sets of the game boards
into “macro-boards” of various configurations.
Use additional units to make larger forces.
REAL-TIME GAME
Allow cach player only ix minutes to
Complete his turn from wart to. finish
\incloding combat resolution),
‘6
Fector Readout ‘2’
BELWO,
Wen doseribing a unit by its factors, read the
Units feetors In @."2" patorn, For exam
Y&2H=10/6-8 descrbos the factors of
German Wirbelwind count.
A NOTE ON THE “SEQUENCE-OF PLAY’
(em the Rules Folder)
Usually the German player moves fist (8 out.
linc inthe saquenceot-play). Some situs
tiens, however, call for the Fusion Player to
Germans move second: that is, EVERY tun in
EVERY. Situation Is 9 Complete Tur com
siaing of two Player Turns.
LENINGRAD
FINDING THE BATTLES IN THE WAR
‘As you may have already novesd, all but one
of the game situations given occured between
Suly “43. ond duly "44. Why this portiulor
Deriod? Simply because botore July "43 the
‘Gorman wore almost alias abe 1 defeat the
Russians in a rather one sided fathion while
aftr duly 74 It was the Russians who were
winning most of the battles. This period, thon,
oar the mitpoint of the war, the petiod in
Which both sos were roughly “equal”,
portculerly in a tactical sense. In a strategic
Senco the Rusians had assumed superiority #9
‘the first half of 1943. But tactical superiority
"was harder to\come by. Yer the German forces
in the East took 8 toribia beating from the
middle of "43 to the middle of "44 and ie was
this typo of ‘warfare. thet
Sustain and stil maintain. the
‘hey had previously attained for their combat
troops. The Stalingted campaign had been the
SITUATION LOCALES
VOWeA@
@ moscow
beginning of the end for the Germans. After
that campaign wor over the frone was ay shown
fon the map stove (as of 6/7/43). Thon come
the battle of Kursk. A mistake on the part of
the Germans. And bacaueo they attacked
\ahere the Russans were waiting for ther they
lyere dren bale past the Dnieper curing the
Russian's "1843 Summer Offensive. This
ompaign is covered by game situations 5,8, 7
and 12. Sitations 2, 8 and 11 cover the
Russion Winter and Spring 1944 Offensives,
‘These operations left the front line as shown
above (23/6/44). The final battle, which
finaly destroyed the power of the German
‘armies in the eat wae the Destruction of Army
Group Center situations 1 and 4). In this
‘campaign the Germans lost three times at
many men ae fey dc in the West during the
[Bne period, At the end of this push the wont
‘was het cutlde of Warson. The next stop wes
Bertin,
7LARGE UNIT COMPOSITION
Players may use the platoons and companies of one or more counter-sets to
form higher echelon units as per the illustration below.and other higher ech
felon units as per the charts on pages 10 to13,
ADDITIONAL UNITS
150mm Rocket Launcher
Battory (*Nebetweror")
504.80 | 604136 | 4032
250i a0
20H 28 | GOH 16 | wins, | rovincs,
i > “&—_
| = |
Zoe 0:|fue: Or uere B
zz
=f VOLKSGRENADIERS (vc)
he 3,1, 561,39)
BATTALION= e ee,
x x6
ae =
@
REGIMENT= 2 Battalions PLUS: iD
2
2¥o
x
Baye
DIVISION= Fusilier Company
Regiments PLUS:
L3)3, 6)
rca Oates Nea
asl
Engineer Br
Tropa] 6 [apa =
me lier | @|=
112 |1 "N83 Woot I
cana Faaeexechind
AntiTank Br Divisional Artery
ar ola [aga 0-9 32]60
20] ae =o A
rae a ana aaa
‘TAKE NOTE! — There are a number of unite
In thoes charts which are NOT incded in the
‘une. Two of them, the BRIDGE units,
equire special rulos for use. The "6" clas
bre requires to enginoer units and 10 turns
£0 emplace. You simply rave the bridge (on 8
‘ehiela) up to the obetacl to be crossed, along
Sdjocent and take part in no other action, ike
Btacking oc moving, although they may be
Stacked) for 10 turns. The "J" class brge
irs four engineer units and 18 turns to
fmplace. The mines, which ar cari! ie ay
‘ther unit in trucks or wagons, roquirs 16
turns t0 ampiace using one engineer unit. Two
‘nits can do itn eight tune and, four units in
four turns. Mines may not bo emplaced any
fostor—Does NOT opply te miner in Situation Cards
*
“These extra_units ere NOT avilable from
Avalon hill. You must make them up yoursel
GERMAN DIVISIONAL ARTILLERY
‘Add the indicated number of platoons to the Divisions shown on page 12.
‘ADDITIONAL LOW ECHELON UNITS
DIRECTLY ATTACHED To HIGH ECHELON UNITS
DIVISIONS.
(Hcl ECHELON UNIT)
44 Infantry | alla
Panzergrenadier eae 2|2
‘SS Panzer an leet 2 al 2a aa)
Panzer alt |e‘QUANTITY & TYPE OF ADDITIONAL LOW ECHELON UNITS DIRECTLY ATTACHED TO HIGH ECHELON UNITS
é 2 2 my 2
1
3
i
i
ae
i
2
gGERMAN ‘QUANTITY & TYPE OF ADDITIONAL LOW ECHELON UNITS DIRECTLY ATTACHED TO HIGH ECHELON UNITS
LARGE we _< < | = a 20 m1
UNITS Mee 1 5
or |
ae gig c T ii a_i: [ : I :
igo
Sis noe
“nie
>
intone ms 9 2
re Battalion
Battin ame for $5) 2 m3 9!) Tia
Sraten 2 a ese Be 2
Tank
i ee, 1 1 14.
aie 1 p
Battalion | :
Salah essed 2 113 “— Hs
Bettaion
1 Sncrank earaion | 2 2 5 2
Mobile Divion ] rem
BAnivtent Battin | 3 3 how
+ ‘Assault Gun
Baton 1 4
‘Mobile Division
Engine Battalion
Taft | aeeaetar 2 (al? «(2
3 Reamer” 1 a
Regiment POO) | 2 a
Motorized Infentry
1| Regione (P2 Div 3
1] fg 2 OM) my: ay 2 fo 3 2
1] Regiment 2
PER HIGH ECHELON UNIT
i
“LINN NO7SHOS S7GGWN Had (SU3LNAOD 3NVD) SLINA NOTH MOT 40 34AL ® ALLINYNO
ag
TGUANTITY & TYPE OF MIDDLE ECHELON UI
a] | serene, if 2 i 22
$$ Armored
2] | tetanary Regiment @ 3} 3 am| | 27 |i3 3 2
‘Assoult Gun
Brigade
LOW ECHELON
ro ele ie
Pic Ne ee pane 9
vai | an | a2 [aan sv0 [20] 531 | mio] 720Campaign
Analysis
MOBILE FORCES
Before 1943. the Soviet tank forces, while
important, hod 0 toke second pice 10 the
infantry. in such a defensive war, and without
competent atiery to back them up, the Only
fective defense opinst the numerous ord wel
fxecuted. German advancot was. marie of
Infantry. For example, atthe end of 1949 when
the Russian "mobile offensive” was telly
getting into geet, only some 320,000 of the
4,000,000 Russian "ground combat troops” at
‘he front wore inthe "mobile fores.” Thet's
Cony 8%. The Gorman figure forthe same period
‘was 14%, and thay hod sen better days. The
‘organization of Soviet mobile forces had
‘hanged litle since 1941. The mein problem
twas that it was only in early 1941 that the
Fussansroalized wat the Germans had known
since the mid ‘90's. The key to mobile wartare
was the "balanced combinad arms toem." Ard
{his was just the sort of unit the Soviets were
least able 10 create, Most of the large mobile
formations the Fusions had in early 41 were
wiped out during the fist German advances,
[After that, as more armored vehicles came off
the production lines, smal! amored unite wore
formed that would later be combined into the
Funsion equivalot of the German “panera.
Practical purboses, tank dhision, And a
Particularly well ergonized. one. at that. It
voided one glaring errr of al the early western
tank civisions; too many tanks and not enough
infantry. By 1943/48 most armies he! relied
{heir error ad their tank divisions were about
30% infantry. The Tank Corps was the same,
452% ofits strength war infantry, almost all off
‘SMG armed. It also contained 240 ermored
flohting vehicles | (AFV= tanks and other gun
‘armed and armored vehicle). Its one main
‘neakness was 3 lack of artillery, for all practical
‘urposee there was none. Thu if th tank cots
{ame up against any organizad (backed up by
rilery) fesitanco it had t0 oither try and
smash its way through (arisky undertaking, 99
‘round the resistance or pullback and walt for
{tiendly Infantry and arlery *0 show up. This
lest option usally signallod the end of whetever
“offensive” the rank corps was parte;pating in
Campaign analysis matoral i from Stavegy &
Tactics Mogazine, copyright 1970, Simulation
‘Systems Corp, used with permission,
“
‘Another deficiney of the Soviet tank forces
‘was the lick of an efficient supply service,
Pertcuiay a motorized one. One of the things
hich prevented the Germans fom overunning
all of Rusa in 1941 was a truly “motorized”
‘supply sve
“Toa certain extont thisv' to trusof the Allied
advance vos France | 1944, But inthis re,
Were thewestern wore bos quipped anc
the Germans scirewhat les well off, the
Fussans were rally in rouble
lok atthe proportions of"
‘the Soviet my 80% of the troops were in
{combat uns in the German army 40% ware i
‘combet its n the Amrcan ermy only 23%
were getting shot at. However, during the wor
the Americans had the finest artery force ever
put into the lets, the Russians the Teast
efficient. They needed every men atthe front.
Thus Ruslan “offeneves” were usualy limited
‘to theamount of milange the tanks could get out
of ona or two load of fuel, But the tank corps
hhad plenty of good points. It was» relatively
seal force with a large “punch.” The Gorman
“44 panzerdwsion hod 13,700 men, S200
Infantry, 213 artilry weapons and 150 AF.
‘The Soviet tank corps had 133 fener men (tbe
fed and supplied and replaced when wounded),
27% fewer infantry (But all wore armed with
‘utomatic weapons), an equel_ amount of
artilery weapons (although the German ones
\were often more efficient, ard 60% more AFV
(of equal i not superior desig). Moroover, by
the end of 1943 the Fusions had more tank
‘corps (26) than the Germans. had. panzer