Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Sense hacking

Suggestions

Hi, this is a really interesting topic so I thought to share some ideas you could explore that came to mind. One was managing sensory experiences such as overstimulation or understimulation in neurodiverse populations to increase happiness. Technology use and being out of touch with our senses impacting our happiness (dissociation) could be another area to look into. You could also discuss mindfulness and mediation research that focuses on using the senses and why it is helpful.

Some articles I came across:

1. Finck, C., Avila, A., Jiménez-Leal, W., Botero, J. P., Shambo, D., Hernandez, S., Reinoso-Carvalho, F., & Andonova, V. (2023). A multisensory mindfulness experience: exploring the promotion of sensory awareness as a mindfulness practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1230832–1230832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1230832.
2. Brown, D. B., Bravo, A. J., Roos, C. R., & Pearson, M. R. (2015). Five Facets of Mindfulness and Psychological Health: Evaluating a Psychological Model of the Mechanisms of Mindfulness. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0349-4
3. Clément, M.-A., Lee, K., Park, M., Sinn, A., & Miyake, N. (2022). The Need for Sensory-Friendly “Zones”: Learning From Youth on the Autism Spectrum, Their Families, and Autistic Mentors Using a Participatory Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 883331–883331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883331

Hopefully this was a helpful brainstorm, good luck with writing your chapter! U3229132 (discuss • contribs) 05:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Question

Hiya,

Is sense-hacking weaponised through things like solitary confinement? Maybe discussing this sort of negative outcome of it could be interesting? U3249300 (discuss • contribs) 12:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings Excellent – Well developed 2-level heading structure. Meaningful headings clearly relate directly to the core topic. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment Quiz doesn't need a separate heading; instead embed quiz questions within relevant sections 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided Use present, rather than future, tense (fixed) Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios) Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations Promising balance of theory and research See what you can find about the Sensual Awareness Inventory by George W. Burns Use APA style 7th edition for citations with three or more authors (i.e., FirstAuthor et al., year) Conclusion (the most important section): Underway What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented, captioned, and cited The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view Well done on creating and uploading your own image! – this can also be listed as a social contribution 6. Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Promising use of quiz question(s) A citation or explanation to support this question is recommended Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information (could work well for listing the five senses with examples of sense-hacking) Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s), table(s) etc. 7. References Good Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting include hyperlinked dois 8. Resources See also Excellent External links Very good Include source in brackets after link 9. User page Excellent – used effectively Excellent description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Stray link

Hiya, one of the quizzes seems to have a stray link to an image that doesn't lead anywhere. I don't want to assume you didn't want the image there and overstep so I thought I would just let you know :'3 U3249300 (discuss • contribs) 13:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Excellent use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Well developed Engages reader via a case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Explains the problem or phenomenon Add definition of sense hacking Clear focus questions Provide focus questions in a feature box to help guide the reader (fixed) Theory An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds somewhat on previous, related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Very effective use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help clearly convey key theoretical information Key citations are well used Insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) in the early sections Wonderful use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Excellent review of relevant research Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident Integration Excellent integration between theory and research Conclusion Excellent summary and conclusion, with a call to action Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections Add sub-headings, so they appear in the table of contents (fixed) Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance Check and make correct use of commas APA style Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used ... as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159) Tables Use APA style for captions. See example (fixed) Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). To improve: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References use very good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[1] Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Learning features Excellent use of learning features Reasonably good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of image(s) Excellent use of table(s) Excellent use of feature box(es) Excellent use of case studies or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Use alphabetical order Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Use alphabetical order Include sources in parentheses after the link Social contribution ~10 logged, useful, moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)