Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunder Madakshira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunder Madakshira

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads like a CV. All the references in the article provide routine coverage of him or his appointment as marketing head. At best he can be mentioned in the infobox of Adobe India (if an article is ever created) but I don't think CMO is a noteworthy position. M4DU7 (talk) 04:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 04:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 04:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, including Business Line (Like this Link 1), Opinions of Sunder Madakshira are published by Economic Times (Link 1, Link 2) and also looks like prominent person in Indian Subcontinent (1, Link 2, Link 3, Link 4), (Link 5) this does pass WP:GNG

Some other reliable sources

"Adobe appoints Sunder Madakshira as Head of Marketing for India". Financial Express. 17 May 2017.
"Adobe appoints Sunder Madakshira as Head of Marketing for India". Business Standard. 17 May 2017.
"Adobe appoints Sunder Madakshira as Head of Marketing for India". Asian News International. 23 August 2017.
"Asia Pacific Marketers Focused on AI and Digital Skills". Business World. 28 February 2018.
Significant coverage on Outlook India

- MRRaja001 (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All of these sources are either WP:INTERVIEWS, passing mentions, or press releases - indeed, many of the sources are the same press release, republished identically word for word in different outlets. I'm not seeing anything independent and secondary that gives depth of coverage. Fails GNG. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:50, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Girth's analysis of the referecnes. It shows the skills of the subject's publicist but not the notability. Ifnord (talk) 16:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.