User talk:Megh10

Welcome!

Hello, Megh10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Woogee (talk) 02:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle campbell

Please read WP:BLP. If you are creating an article about a living person, you must provide reliable sources. Woogee (talk) 02:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Danielle campbell

A tag has been placed on Danielle campbell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Danielle campbell. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Woogee (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Want to be unblocked? An offer

This is a little bit out of my area of knowledge, but if Danielle Campbell is the star of a new Disney movie then she probably meets WP:ENT. You have two choices here - either write an article in a user sandbox, or start it at the article incubator. Either way, once the article is in a fit state for transfer to mainspace, there is WP:DRV to get the salting of the title undone. A well-prepared article that meets WP:ACTOR, WP:V, WP:CITE etc will have a good chance of making it to mainspace. The titles have been salted so you won't be able to create the articles there.

I've been in discussion with Fastily, and he is ameniable to your unblocking if you wish to edit constructively. The above offer is open, and I am prepared to unblock you if you state that you will not edit in a disruptive manner again, and once unblocked you keep your word. Mjroots (talk) 08:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I deeply apologize for my constant editing in a disruptive manner. I promise that I shall not do this again, and I promise that I will keep my word for this. Once again, I am sorry and I regret my mistakes. Megh10 (talk) 23:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

AGF that you will keep your word and will have learnt from this. Mjroots (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: Mjroots (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

If you want help in creating a sandbox give me a yell. I have cleared the autoblock on your IP address so you should be able to edit freely. If you find that you are still blocked please post on this talk page. Mjroots (talk) 06:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank you for giving me a second chance. I shall live up to my promise and once again, thank you very much. Megh10 (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Big Time Rush

I'd appreciate it if you'd stop changing information regarding the release date of the Big Time Rush album, which will be released in October now, as stated by the band themselves. So please stop changing the info to the incorrect date of August 10, 2010. CloversMallRat (talk) 06:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I am sorry about it. I'll stop the editing. Megh10 (talk) 17:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]