User talk:JDZeff
|
Thanks for visiting and contributing!
SwisterTwister talk 22:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Wicnic 2012
[edit]I just wanted to say that I had a great time at the 2012 Los Angeles Wicnic, and I hope everybody else there did too. Everybody was warm, friendly and welcoming and I hope to see all of you again next year.JDZeff (talk) 21:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
You're invited! FemTech Edit-a-Thon at Claremont Graduate University
[edit]| October 26 - FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
Everyone is invited to the first FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable at Claremont Graduate University on October 26 from 3-6 pm. The event will open with a roundtable discussion about feminism and anti-racist technology projects, followed by an edit-a-thon focusing on feminists & women in science. Experienced Wikipedians will be on hand to support new editors. We hope you can join us! Sign up here - see you there! 01:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you, but no thank you. Not only am I unable to attend (lack of transportation and medical issues) I have absolutely no interest in the topic, being of the wrong gender.JDZeff (talk) 06:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
San Diego Comic-Con International meetup proposal
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/LA/SDCC1. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
2013 Wikinic
[edit]
|
Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park | 
|
| You are invited to the third Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there! —howcheng {chat} 01:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite. |
1920s in Los Angeles
[edit]Hi there - I noticed your name at the Meetup LA8 page for the wicnic so I thought 1920s in Los Angeles might interest you. If not, no worries. --Rosiestep (talk) 21:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia Meetup
[edit]You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 03:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia Meetup
[edit]Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 02:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Edit-a-thons at UC Riverside
[edit]The UCR Libraries are hosting three edit-a-thons focusing on their great special collections (science fiction, water resources, the Inland Empire and more) on Oct. 12, 2013, Oct. 26, 2013, and Nov. 23, 2013. Please participate if you can! Details and signup here. All are welcome, new and experienced editors alike! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 04:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
March 9 edit-a-thon at MOCA in downtown LA
[edit]| LA Meetup: March 9 edit-a-thon at MOCA | |
|---|---|
 Dear fellow Wikipedian, You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the Museum of Contemporary Art in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday, March 9, 2014 from 11 am to 6 pm! This event is in collaboration with MOCA and the arts collective East of Borneo and aims to improve coverage of LA art since the 1980s. (Even if contemporary art isn't your thing, you're welcome to join too!) Please RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! User:Calliopejen1 (talk) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
May 10 Asian Pacific American edit-a-thon in LA
[edit]| LA Meetup: May 10 Asian Pacific American edit-a-thon | |
|---|---|
 Dear fellow Wikipedian, You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the Junipero Serra Branch of the LA Public Library (4607 S. Main St., 90037) on Saturday, May 10, 2014 from 10 am to 4 pm! This event is sponsored by the Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Center and the Asian Pacific American Librarians Association and aims to improve coverage of Asian Pacific American topics, particularly as they relate to southern California. Please RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
LA edit-a-thons on May 23 and 31
[edit]| LA meetups: Adrianne Wadewitz memorial edit-a-thons on May 23 and May 31 | |
|---|---|
 Dear fellow Wikipedian, There are two LA edit-a-thons in memory of Adrianne Wadewitz, a prolific Wikipedia editor, in the coming weeks. Please join us May 23 at Occidental College and May 31 at the Institute of Cultural Inquiry to combat systemic bias and help further Adrianne's legacy. No experience needed! Please RSVP at the relevant page(s) if you plan to attend. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
L.A. events on June 21 and July 6
[edit]|
Upcoming L.A. events: Unforgetting L.A. edit-a-thon (Saturday, June 21, 12-5pm) and Wiknic (Sunday, July 6, ~9:30am-4pm) |
|---|
|
Gallery at 356 S. Mission Rd.  Get hungry for the Wiknic! Dear fellow Wikipedian, The L.A. Wikipedia community has two exciting events coming up in the next few weeks: an edit-a-thon sponsored by the online magazine East of Borneo, and the fourth annual Los Angeles Wiknic! The East of Borneo event is an edit-a-thon that aims to build a better history of art in Southern California. This next chapter of their Unforgetting L.A. series will take place on Saturday, June 21, 2014 from 12pm to 5pm at 356 S. Mission Rd. (map). Beginners welcome! Please RSVP here if you plan to attend. For more info, see eastofborneo.org/unforgetting. The Wiknic is a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is tentatively planned for Pan-Pacific Park (map) and will be held on Sunday, July 6, 2014 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible! I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. |
Unforgetting L.A. edit-a-thon on September 6
[edit]| Unforgetting L.A. edit-a-thon: Saturday, September 6 from 11am to 4pm | |
|---|---|
 Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to meet up with online magazine East of Borneo for an edit-a-thon to build a better history of art in Southern California. This next event in their Unforgetting L.A. series will take place on Saturday, September 6, 2014 from 11am - 4pm at the Armory Center for the Arts in Pasadena (map). Beginners welcome! Please RSVP here if you plan to attend. For more info, see eastofborneo.org/unforgetting. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
L.A. Meetup on September 21
[edit]| The 20th Los Angeles meetup: Sunday, September 21 from 11am to 4pm | |
|---|---|
|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, Join us on Sunday, September 21, from 11am to 4pm at Kramer Studio in Mid-City (map) for a meetup and edit-a-thon! Get to know the Los Angeles Wikipedia community and do some editing (or learn to edit!) in a collaborative environment. Please RSVP and consider becoming a member of the SoCal task force to help us improve articles about everything in the region. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
L.A. events on October 7 and 16
[edit]| Upcoming L.A. events: Wik-Ed Women edit-a-thon (10/7, 6-10pm) and UCR edit-a-thon (10/16, 10am-4pm) | |
|---|---|
|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, The Southern California Wikipedia community has two exciting events coming up in the next few weeks: a Wik-Ed Women editing session downtown designed to combat systemic bias, and a Wikipedia Loves Libraries event at UC Riverside! Wik-Ed Women is a new monthly series of informal Wikipedia editing sessions for Los Angeles women-in-the-arts (though all are welcome) to contribute their expertise to Wikipedia, specifically expanding content about women artists. This second session will take place on Tuesday, October 7 from 6pm to 10pm at the Los Angeles Contemporary Archive downtown. Please RSVP here if you plan to attend. The UC Riverside Wikipedia Loves Libraries event is an edit-a-thon targeting articles related to UC Riverside, SoCal, and beyond. Join students and faculty learning how to edit! This event will take place on Thursday, October 16 from 10am to 4pm at UCR's Tomás Rivera Library. Again, RSVPs are requested here. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
SoCal edit-a-thons on October 21 and 25
[edit]| Upcoming SoCal edit-a-thons: UC Riverside (10/21, 10am-3pm) and Unforgetting L.A. (10/25, 9am-5pm) | |
|---|---|
 Dear fellow Wikipedian, The Southern California Wikipedia community has two more events scheduled for the month of October: a water-related edit-a-thon at UC Riverside, and an Unforgetting L.A. event at the Los Angeles Archives Bazaar in conjunction with L.A. as Subject! As part of Wikipedia Loves Libraries and to celebrate Open Access Week, UC Riverside is participating alongside other Western Waters Digital Library members in an edit-a-thon focusing on water issues. Join students and faculty learning how to edit! This event will take place on Tuesday, October 21 from 10am to 3pm at UCR's Orbach Science Library (map). RSVPs are requested here. The Unforgetting L.A. edit-a-thon and training workshop will take place at the 9th annual Los Angeles Archives Bazaar, and is hosted by online magazine East of Borneo in partnership with L.A. as Subject. Join us on Saturday, October 25 from 9am to 5pm at the USC Doheny Memorial Library (map). Beginners welcome! Please RSVP here if you plan to attend. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
OOPS!!
[edit]I added absentmindedly added "{{Welcome}}" to your empty user page (instead of to this user talk page), without "subst"ing it. Then i added the following:
- And thanks for your commentary contribution at Talk:Slungshot#Another name. I'm creating heavey to implement your suggestion; sorry it has taken so long -- we can use every new contributor, in spite of the growth since i started editing, over a dozen years back!
I think i read you right in deducing the word derives from heave rather than heavy, and is pronounced with its first syllable sounding like "heave", not like the first syl of "heavy"; i'm gonna count on you to fix it if I'm wrong.
--Jerzy•t 03:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC) - Thank you. Back in '72, when I served in the Pacific Fleet, that was the only name ever used for them. Maybe some day I'll find a proper citation and add it to the article. JDZeff (talk) 23:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
And then and a bot came along and subst-ed it (as i should have).
You're unlikely to be as compulsive as i, and even less likely to feel you've been harmed by having the edit history mucked up (by me, and by the bot that responded to my non-substing) on a page where you are entitled to be the only one editing it. If you prefer the page stay blank, you are free to edit it back to blankness (altho my, the bot's, and your edit would still be reflected on (and readable via) its edit-history page). So if you prefer to be "made whole" by having it be invisible (to anyone but admins, IIRC) that it ever existed (i.e., that anyone has edited the page), i am sure any admin you'd approach would "blank the edit history" by deleting both the existing "revisions" of the page. (I'm not offering to do it myself, bcz IMO you'd be negligent to trust the advice of the offender about what it takes to undo the damage!)
--Jerzy•t 13:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Rye bread are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Psycho (1960 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago (talk) 02:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- You are joking, I hope. The "reliable source" is the novel itself. Do you really think that Wikipedia needs a third-party source for something like that? In case you haven't noticed, Wikipedia only requires citations for potentially controversial material, and I find it hard to believe that anybody would find something like this controversial! JDZeff (talk) 03:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- As I noted in my above comment, please review WP:IPCV as well. For "in popular culture" items you need to provide a secondary source to establish that the pop culture reference is considered significant in some manner. DonIago (talk) 04:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Even so, if you think that the passage needs a reference, the proper way to handle it was to add a citation needed tag, not delete it. And the scene didn't just have a passing mention of the movie, the movie was important to the murder, and to the book's plot. I'd suggest that you get a copy of the book and read it to see why I felt it worth mentioning. JDZeff (talk) 05:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- You may not like the way I handled it, but there's nothing in policy that prohibits removing material that you wish to challenge, especially newly-added material. If the movie is so important to the book, then it should be easy enough to find a source that discusses it? DonIago (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Like almost any of the hits on this web search? https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=Psycho+%22Dark+in+Death%22&cat=web&pl=ext-ff&language=english&extVersion=1.3.0 JDZeff (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say "almost any" as at least one of them is a wiki and several are retail sites, but one of the other sites may suffice. DonIago (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah; I was thinking of a review from a newspaper or magazine. Certainly not from a blog or a retail site. BTW, you might want to take a look at an earlier novel in the series, Witness in Death. It starts during Opening Night of a new production of "Witness for the Prosecution," and when the climactic on-stage killing turns real, the book's protagonist transforms from a member of the audience into the first cop on scene, the Primary in the investigation and one of over 3,000 witness. I mention it only because the play is in many ways central to the story, and finding references to cite should be trivial. JDZeff (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- A (ideally well-established) newspaper or magazine review should suffice. I don't have a lot of bandwidth these days, unfortunately, but I'll keep your recommendation in mind! DonIago (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Just buy a copy in paperback from Amazon or Barns & Noble. JDZeff (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- A (ideally well-established) newspaper or magazine review should suffice. I don't have a lot of bandwidth these days, unfortunately, but I'll keep your recommendation in mind! DonIago (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah; I was thinking of a review from a newspaper or magazine. Certainly not from a blog or a retail site. BTW, you might want to take a look at an earlier novel in the series, Witness in Death. It starts during Opening Night of a new production of "Witness for the Prosecution," and when the climactic on-stage killing turns real, the book's protagonist transforms from a member of the audience into the first cop on scene, the Primary in the investigation and one of over 3,000 witness. I mention it only because the play is in many ways central to the story, and finding references to cite should be trivial. JDZeff (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say "almost any" as at least one of them is a wiki and several are retail sites, but one of the other sites may suffice. DonIago (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Like almost any of the hits on this web search? https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=Psycho+%22Dark+in+Death%22&cat=web&pl=ext-ff&language=english&extVersion=1.3.0 JDZeff (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- You may not like the way I handled it, but there's nothing in policy that prohibits removing material that you wish to challenge, especially newly-added material. If the movie is so important to the book, then it should be easy enough to find a source that discusses it? DonIago (talk) 13:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Even so, if you think that the passage needs a reference, the proper way to handle it was to add a citation needed tag, not delete it. And the scene didn't just have a passing mention of the movie, the movie was important to the murder, and to the book's plot. I'd suggest that you get a copy of the book and read it to see why I felt it worth mentioning. JDZeff (talk) 05:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- As I noted in my above comment, please review WP:IPCV as well. For "in popular culture" items you need to provide a secondary source to establish that the pop culture reference is considered significant in some manner. DonIago (talk) 04:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
You missed the reason for my addition to the talk page
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.