User talk:I LOST WALL HACKS

November 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mario Kart have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mario Kart was changed by I LOST WALL HACKS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959051 on 2024-11-26T14:57:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bugatti Chiron. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bugatti Chiron was changed by I LOST WALL HACKS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959022 on 2024-11-26T15:02:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bugatti Chiron. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 15:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 15:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I am writing this letter to sincerely apologize for my recent actions that led to what can only be described as vandalism on Wikipedia. I understand the importance of Wikipedia as a collaborative platform that relies on the contributions of countless individuals who strive to provide accurate and reliable information. My actions not only undermined the integrity of this platform but also disrespected the hard work of many dedicated contributors.

First and foremost, I want to acknowledge the impact of my actions. Wikipedia is a resource that millions of people rely on for information across a wide range of topics. By altering content in a way that was misleading or false, I contributed to the spread of misinformation. I recognize that this is particularly harmful in an age where accurate information is more crucial than ever, and I deeply regret my role in that.

I want to clarify that my intention was never to harm or mislead anyone. However, I fully understand that intentions do not excuse the consequences of my actions. I acted impulsively and without consideration for the community guidelines that govern Wikipedia. The moment I made those edits, I failed to respect the collaborative spirit of this platform, which is built on trust and mutual respect among contributors.

I have taken some time to reflect on why I made these edits in the first place. I realize now that I allowed my personal biases and emotions to cloud my judgment. In doing so, I lost sight of the fundamental principles that Wikipedia stands for—neutrality, verifiability, and a commitment to providing reliable information. It is a privilege to contribute to such a valuable resource, and I squandered that privilege through my thoughtless actions.

Additionally, I want to express my regret for the time and effort that my vandalism caused to other editors. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort that requires the dedication and hard work of many individuals. By introducing false information, I not only disrupted the flow of accurate content but also placed an unnecessary burden on other contributors who had to identify and correct my mistakes. I am truly sorry for any frustration or inconvenience I may have caused.

Moving forward, I am committed to making amends and ensuring that such behavior does not occur again. I recognize that an apology alone is not enough; it must be accompanied by a genuine effort to learn from this experience and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. To that end, I have taken several steps to educate myself about Wikipedia's guidelines and best practices for editing.

I have reviewed the Wikipedia guidelines on reliable sources, neutrality, and the importance of citing verifiable information. I understand now that every edit should be made with the intention of improving the quality of the content, rather than serving personal agendas or opinions. I am also committed to engaging with other contributors in a respectful and constructive manner, recognizing that collaboration is key to the success of Wikipedia.

Furthermore, I plan to contribute positively to the platform by focusing on areas where I can add value. Instead of making impulsive edits, I will take the time to research topics thoroughly and ensure that my contributions are well-informed and supported by reliable sources. I believe that by doing so, I can help restore the trust that may have been lost due to my actions.

I also want to encourage others who may be tempted to engage in similar behavior to think twice before making edits that could be considered vandalism. The Wikipedia community is built on the principles of collaboration and respect, and it is essential that we all do our part to uphold these values. If you are ever unsure about an edit, I urge you to seek guidance from experienced contributors or refer to the comprehensive guidelines available on the platform.

In closing, I want to reiterate my heartfelt apology to the Wikipedia community. I am deeply sorry for my actions and the disruption they caused. I understand that trust must be earned, and I am committed to working diligently to regain the confidence of my fellow contributors. Thank you for your understanding and for the incredible work that you do to maintain the integrity of this invaluable resource.

Sincerely, I LOST WALL HACKS (talk) 15:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ferret,

Furthermore from your indefinite block, I have reviewed my opinion and decided to take a different approach to this matter. I feel that my banning from Wikipedia was unjust and not reflective of my contributions to the platform. My intention has always been to enhance the quality of information available to users, and I have dedicated significant time and effort to ensure that the content I added was accurate, well-sourced, and in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. Despite my best efforts, I found myself facing a ban that I believe was not warranted. I understand that Wikipedia has strict policies to maintain the integrity of its content, but I feel that my actions were misinterpreted or taken out of context. It’s disheartening to think that my commitment to sharing knowledge and improving the encyclopedia has led to such a negative outcome. I would appreciate a chance to discuss the reasons behind my ban and to clarify any misunderstandings that may have occurred. I value the collaborative nature of Wikipedia and want to be a part of that community, contributing positively rather than being sidelined. If your opinion does not change, I will be obliged to report your unjust and unfair biased reports to Wikipedia admins higher up than yourself, expressing my wish for your account to be removed from this community indefinitely.

Sincerely, I LOST WALL HACKS (talk) 15:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]