User:FastLizard4/RFA Votes
Appearance
Please don't edit this page. Thanks.
RfA Votes
[edit]Key:
-- Support
-- Oppose
-- Neutral
-- Asked question
-- Commented
-- Withdrawn (generally by WP:SNOW)
-- Unsuccessful (not withdrawn, however)
-- Successful
-- I nominated
Stormtracker94 (2) -- Stormtracker94 (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Details
Chris G (3) -- Chris G (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Chris G (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) -- Details
Wenli -- Wenli (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Details
Details
[edit]Stormtracker94 (2): Oppose -- I don't think that 3 months is a long enough experience span, and I am moved to oppose by the candidates lack of answers to questions 4-7. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Links for this user: Stormtracker94 (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks)
Chris G (3): Support -- Has close to 1,000 mainspace edits (good enough for me) and runs 3 bots, this would seem to indicate trust by the community; no blocks; and seems to be an all-around good guy. Like his responses to the questions, probably would make a good administrator. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 06:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Links for this user: Chris G (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Chris G (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Wenli: Question 6: -- What are your opinions about Wikipedia's recent move to allow anons to create pages? FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 03:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Links for this user: Wenli (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks)
- Answer -- I believe that anonymous users are not allowed to create pages, as described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
Support -- Wenli has enough edits to satisfy my tastes, and seems to be trusted by the community. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
FINAL (19/15/4); Ended Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:59 (UTC)
AfD Votes
[edit]Key:
-- Keep
-- Delete
-- Neutral
-- Commented
-- Complex Result
-- Deleted
-- Kept
-- Withdrawn
-- I nominated
Marijuana etiquette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) -- Details
United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) -- Details
Details
[edit]Marijuana etiquette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) (View log)
It's not notable, it's unsourced and looks like it's made up by the author (to me, at least). At best, this should be merged into the article Marijuana. FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 02:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) (View log)
Keep - It is not really the same thing as those other articles, and Speedy Keep because it has only been about a month since the last nomination, also, per ColonelWarden, needing cleanup is not the same as needing deletion. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 03:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
The result was keep. - JForget 00:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)