Talk:Support function
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Support function article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a mathematical diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Diagram
[edit]A nice diagram would have an origin, a curve around the origin, and tangent planes drawn with rays from the origin to the planes. As I heard Strang put it today in a lecture, the support function is supporting the set with a bunch of planes. —Ben FrantzDale 02:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Perimeter
[edit]- on the perimeter of M.
How is the perimeter of a regular surface M defined? --Abdull (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Unresolved issues
[edit]- A figure illustrating the definition would be nice (similar to the one in Richard Gardner's book on geometric tomography)
- I was not sure about the use of support functions outside convex geometry. I therefore included the original definition
for orientable manifolds under Variants. Anybody who knows more about this? (I am tempted to omit it completely)
- Are the Categories correct? I am a newcomer on wikipedia and haven't overview over the categories and their correct use.
- I avoided the notion of "convex body", as in the wiki-definition "convex bodies" always contain interior points and this is not needed here anywhere.
Nysgerrig (talk) 15:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- I added a number of Wikilinks to the summary, but did not include one for "non-empty set", as "non-empty" redirects to empty set, which in turn refers one to inhabited set, which is not quite the same thing. Others might question my decision.