Jump to content

Talk:Qantas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateQantas is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 4, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 16, 2013, and November 16, 2020.

747 flypast

[edit]
747-400ER (VH-OEE) performing a flypast over Sydney at the end of what is likely to be the final commercial flight by a Qantas 747, on 29 March 2020[1]

The above image has been removed, twice. The first time the edit summary was "QANTAS has not retired the 747. Stop Posting."; I restored with a citation (as seen above), and the edit summary "Restored with source - and you don't need to remove the image if you disagree with the caption"; it was removed again with the edit summary "No need for the image".

That's not how Wikipedia works.

References

  1. ^ "KLM, Qantas Reportedly Flying Final 747 Flights This Weekend". AirlineGeeks.com. 27 March 2020. Retrieved 30 March 2020. VH-OEE is expected to make the fleet's final passenger flight when it departs Santiago, Chile and arrives in Sydney on March 28. Flight QF28 is expected to arrive at 5:50 p.m. local time

-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:00, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Likely to be" is pure speculation. I suggest removing the image per WP:CRYSTAL.--Jetstreamer Talk 16:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jetstreamer Please cite the part of WP:CRYSTAL that mandates the removal of images; or indeed text such as that as in this example. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place, as even notable events can be cancelled or postponed at the last minute by a major incident." That said, "Likely to be" marks it has not been definite. The caption is at least misleading. If showing a Qantas 747 aircraft is the main intention I suggest changing the caption.--Jetstreamer Talk 18:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So nothing in WP:CRYSTAL mandates the removal of images; and yet the image has again been removed, citing exactly that page; and we agree that no claim that a "date" is "definite" is made. I also note that WP:CRYSTAL also includes "It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about ... whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced." and "Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included" Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Pigsonthewing: Please take everything in what Wikipedia is NOT into consideration here. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and encyclopaedias deal with long standing and well established details - not things that may turn out to be true (this is the main tenor of WP Crystal). The 747 gone idea is possible but far from established. Qantas announced that they were grounding their A380s a month or so ago and they have been flying almost daily to the US over the last week or so. When you read advice in the Wikipedia help pages it is important to realise that the help given is rarely prescriptive, it gives examples of the sort of things that are necessary to buld a sensible reliable encyclopaedia. Please do not expect the answer to be written in black and white and if it does not specifically answer the question you have say "well that is OK then and do it anyway" that is not how it works. Andrewgprout (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've taken "everything in what Wikipedia is NOT into consideration". None of it mandates the removal of an image such as this and none of it mandates the removal of text such as that used in its caption. Would you now like to take into consideration the quotes from WP:CRYSTAL, which I gave above? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The source you referenced is not reliable and has been contradicted by many other, more reputable sites. The image isn't really relavent what purpose does it serve, none. It doesn't inform anyone. It would be more fitting for the image, if they had have been retired , which they have not to be placed in the Qantas History Article IMO.--Life200BC (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of other reliable, sites saying th same thing. No contradictory reliable site has been cited. The image is highly relevant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
https://simpleflying.com/qantas-747-parking/ https://www.executivetraveller.com/news/qantas-boeing-747-retired All indicating that they have not being retired despite rumors suggesting otherwise. Until QANTAS announces that they have retired the planes i suggest that this speculative image and caption not be posted. If QANTAS does retire the Queen I believe that this would be a fitting addition.--Life200BC (talk) 10:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's unclear why you believe your sources (one of which says "What could be the last flight of a Qantas Boeing 747 took place on Sunday afternoon...", the other itself speculative) more reliable than the one I gave above; but as I said other reliable sources also support the claim in my caption text. And in any case, if your sources are correct, it neither mandates the removal of the image nor precludes a change to its caption. The image is not speculative - do you dispute that the aircraft conducted a flyby over Sydney? Why do you think that was? Why do you not think that event worthy of mention? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The sources which I refer to have talked to QANTAS. The one you have has not and is purely speculative. No sources have QANTAS saying they have retired the 747. QANTAS has done many flybys. The reason behind this could be insignificant, such as being the last international flight to Sydney before the grounding of QFI. A flyby isn't really relavent to a section of this article and doesn't add anything to it. If QANTAS does retire the 747 and this turns out to be the last commercial flight this image should be posted. Until then I believe it is irrelavent and speculative without a reliable source, which isn't contradicted by the owner.-Until QANTAS themselves announces that they have been retired this image should not be included.-Life200BC (talk) 11:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are we still pretending this didn't happen? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qantas fleet

[edit]

I was wondering about to export Qantas current fleet and Qantas livery in to Qantas fleet page as per Wikipedia splitting there must be atleast 77k bytes but the article size is 150k splitting neededKtdk (talk) 13:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moving sections from Qantas to Qantas fleet

[edit]

I think that details about Qantas' fleet would fit better in that article like liveries and products on the aircraft. I therefore propose that they get moved to that page --Life200BC (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

London Heathrow to be added to focus cities

[edit]

Qantas has a flight from perth to london is planning to expand its flights to London from Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane and this is one of their primary goals NotOrrio (talk) 04:45, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Qantas Mayday and redirect 2023?

[edit]

Hi, not sure how to edit airline articles but can someone add these to the article?

mayday call:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/19/qantas-flight-from-sydney-to-fiji-forced-to-turn-back-after-potential-mechanical-issue

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-19/qantas-mayday-sydney-airport-auckland-aviation/101869928

https://www.9news.com.au/national/qantas-flight-mayday-call-passengers-no-idea-until-landing/d0cf8bb1-bc9e-46a2-891d-d7981dce927f


mechanical issue:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/19/qantas-flight-from-sydney-to-fiji-forced-to-turn-back-after-potential-mechanical-issue Helpingpeopleyay (talk) 06:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody was hurt in either of those incidents. Neither plane suffered damage. Despite some parts of the media making a meal out of them, I don't think they belong in the article. HiLo48 (talk) 06:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thanks for telling! Helpingpeopleyay (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disturbing Page Preview

[edit]

When hovering over the link to this page I noticed that the image appears to be of an animal dissection or something similar. I'm not an editor here but it seemed like someone should probably change it. 2A02:C7C:CAAE:5A00:6867:8706:4A2C:72BA (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more specific. Which link? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed re-order of sections

[edit]

I propose that the sections "Company heads" and "Corporate affairs" be moved down (and possibly reversed) and located between "Services" and "Accidents and incidents". The rational for this is two-fold: first, that the flow of the article would be more natural (i.e., History, Destinations, Fleet, Design, Liveries, Services, Corporate affairs, Company heads, Accidents and incidents, etc.); second, the general reader, in my view, is probably more interested in the company's history, destinations, and what it does (rather than, say, the information that an investor, financial analyst, or business journalist would be interested in finding – and, with all the respect in the world, if those folks are only looking here for that kind of information, they might want to consider another line of work). Before making a relatively significant change like this, it seemed like getting input from others might be wise. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 12:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archived refs not used in the article

[edit]

Sunnya343 (talk) 04:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

[edit]

A series of back and forth edits (starting here) resulted in the partial removal of the entire list of awards. This seems a bit extreme. Qantas have obviously invested a lot of time and effort in research and design, and the outcomes of this (including resulting awards) seem like an aspect of the company's activity and history that ought to be chronicled here somewhere. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS: My mistake, this has been partially reversed (although I'm not sure what criteria we're applying for which awards are listed). -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Qantas&oldid=1251075691"