Talk:Nilgiris district

India: Districts / Tamil Nadu / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

We need to include some information about the Nilgiri Railways... probably something similar to what is present in the Coonoor page. --Madhu 14:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this article has forgotten to mention that part of the Nilgiris district/mountain range is in Karnataka (not only Tamil Nadu and Kerala).

--User:Pimpom123 15:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.--thunderboltz ^(TALK) 16:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tnlogo.png

Image:Tnlogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eucalyptus globulosum

Oh the power of Wikipedia. There is no such species as Eucalyptus globulosum, yet Google comes up with 25 hits all linking back to the one misspelling on this page! Wow, what power Wikipedia has. The caption printed on the image spells it correctly. Apparently the first author of the caption in the Wikipedia article spelled it incorrectly. The correct spelling is Eucalyptus globulus, which I corrected in the caption in the article. Nick Beeson (talk) 14:12, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History

I have spotted some inaccuracies in this section, with a biased view. Please verify and fix. Adwaith s (talk) 17:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Nilgiris District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061130194120/http://www.census.tn.nic.in/religion.aspx to http://www.census.tn.nic.in/religion.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that The Nilgiris district be renamed and moved to Nilgiris district.

result:
Moved. This request is about adhering to the article title policy and naming convention cited by the nom and a supporter, so it is granted. Editors are welcome to continue other discussion about lower- vs. upper-case in a more appropriate venue. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 07:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

The Nilgiris district → Nilgiris district – As per, WP:CONSISTENT with all other articles of the districts in India. ~~Superlatives~~ Definite article is not used, similar to the page Nilgiris (Lok Sabha constituency). ~~Superlatives~~ Definite article is not used in other places names too i.e. The Philippines, The Maldives etc. Hemant Dabral^Talk 03:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and WP:NCTHE. (Though I think you mean "definite articles", not "superlatives".) Should "district" be capitalized? (See my comments under your other submissions.) — the Man in Question (in question) 05:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the Man in Question, I have no problem if you could move or get help in moving 680+ district articles with lower case "district" title to upper case "District" title. Reason i've listed these three pages for the move (Baramati District, Sri Ganganagar District and Tengnoupal District) because these are the only three district articles having upper case "District" title and it looked odd to me in comparison with other 680+ district articles having lower case "district" titles. Although, moving more than 680 articles to upper case "District" would be harder than moving these three articles to lower case "district" for practical reason. By the way thanks for the correction in my comment above. Hemant Dabral^Talk 11:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would happily do that, but we should probably make it a discussion somewhere more visible before simply going forward with it. — the Man in Question (in question) 05:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of districts in India would be a good place to start the discussion. Hemant Dabral^Talk 08:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a good discussion to have, especially when you consider the inconsistencies already prevailing on existing articles (a mixture of "NAME district is..", "NAME District is.." and "NAME is a district.."). Keep this discussion just for what was originally nominated and have the wider discussion somewhere central, as suggested. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the note I wrote at Talk:Baramati District#Requested move 4 May 2020, which I'm moving here since it's relevant to this discussion: "I would think […] that all the lowercase 'district' names should be capitalized. If this is its proper name, then in English it should be capitalized (like 'New York State' or 'Czech Republic'). If this is instead a general description (like 'Great Lakes region') then it should be in lowercase. Compare for example all the articles under these categories: C:Districts of Bangladesh, C:Districts of Ghana, C:Districts of Azerbaijan, C:Districts of Brunei, C:Districts of Afghanistan, C:Districts of Cambodia, and many more—where 'District' is always capitalized. Also, take a look at the discussion going on right now about 'Seoul station'." — the Man in Question (in question) 19:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The current discussion at Talk:Pyongyang Station#Requested move 5 May 2020 (which covers a large number of articles) also seems relevant (though not identical). — the Man in Question (in question) 19:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support move and keep district lowercase, as per other articles. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since you say "as per other articles", I would appreciate your input on the issue I identified at Talk:Baramati District#Requested move 4 May 2020 and similar articles listed by the requester. — the Man in Question (in question) 18:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's a fair question and one that does probably need to be considered on a wider scale. The nature of this rename debate was around the prefixed "the", however the consideration surrounding whether district should be lower or uppercase would affect many articles and I think should be a separate discussion. In the case of the article Pune district, this states the place-name as "Pune" and that it is a district, rather than this forming part of its name. Another example you gave in the other debate was New York State, yet the wikipedia article for this has "State" in parenthesis. I don't understand enough about the geography of these regions to have a conclusive belief either way - it should be understood and perhaps separately discussed how these are officially named/known to decide if the "district" is lower, upper, in parenthesis or not part of the name at all. As per nom, WP:CONSISTENT would say it should be lowercase as things stand right now. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose see Talk:List of districts in India#Outstanding RMs. Andrewa (talk) 03:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrewa: It's worth noting that this move request is only considering the prefix of "the", rather than the capitalisation of "district", and so opposing means you support retaining the prefix? It seems clear there should be a wider discussion on the "district" element, though this move request is not suggesting a change to the current one associated with this article. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, my opposition is that any move to the affected articles is premature. If it were to be clearly understood that this move isn't about (for example) the case of district, and purely about removing the article, then the move would do no great harm. But that isn't clear at all above. It could be argued both ways exactly what this RM is deciding. So the simplest thing is to be clear on the final result for all affected articles before moving any of them, and then (as I have been saying) do a multi-move to fix all those affected. Andrewa (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

BengalTiger in Mudumalai National Park.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

BengalTiger in Mudumalai National Park.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]