Jump to content

User contributions for Sp00n exe

A user with 165 edits. Account created on 7 October 2016.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

18 May 2024

17 March 2024

2 March 2024

16 January 2024

22 May 2023

  • 13:4013:40, 22 May 2023 diff hist −3 Dmitry Medvedev There seems to be some disagreement over which portrait is used, alternating between the 2019 meeting and 2022 photo. The 2022 photo is really undesirable, it's not an official portrait and is more of a candid shot. The 2019 photo is alright, but struggles with resolution. This photo from the Commons in 2016 is most appropriate for now, until a better image can be selected.

7 April 2023

  • 23:5423:54, 7 April 2023 diff hist −349 Petras Griškevičius Undid revision 1148695956 by Renata3 (talk) Is this statement about the book as a whole? No? Then a specific citation is actually needed. You cannot make such a bold and wild statement, supported only by 'this book kind of talks about it.' I've reserved a copy of this book to check out in coming days, in any case the citation should be corrected to this book rather than the thesis if the information is indeed there. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • 15:5615:56, 7 April 2023 diff hist −58 User:Sp00n exe No edit summary
  • 15:5215:52, 7 April 2023 diff hist −349 Petras Griškevičius Undid revision 1148432929 by Renata3 (talk). A correction should be made then, either replacing the book citation with the thesis, or more importantly, to the book from which the claim is directly cited. It is not common practice on Wikipedia to cite information sourced from books second hand, especially when the author gives no reference to what section of the book exactly they got their claim from, other than 'read the entire book to see' Tags: Undo Reverted

7 March 2023

29 October 2022

14 September 2022

22 March 2022

24 February 2022

7 February 2022

18 November 2021

17 November 2021

9 October 2021

18 July 2021

24 May 2021

29 April 2021

21 April 2021

14 February 2021

  • 02:1302:13, 14 February 2021 diff hist −83 Egon Krenz Is this necessary? It doesn't seem particularly relevant or that important. The source provided is also not about this topic.
  • 01:5101:51, 14 February 2021 diff hist −110 South Vietnam There seems to be very little legitimacy in claiming this as a "successor." It controls no territory, and the "government in-exile" is not descended from this entity. It is an organization in the US that is founded by former soldiers and immigrants. Following common styling on Wikipedia, this isn't proper for a government in exile - let alone one that has no claim, recognition, or even descent from the previous gov.

10 February 2021

27 January 2021

18 January 2021

25 December 2020

  • 05:0805:08, 25 December 2020 diff hist −9 Election On what basis does Russia hold "show elections" to the scope described in this article? By all metrics layed out, Russian elections meet standards for legitimate elections. The article itself does not support this claim.

6 December 2020

5 December 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)