User contributions for Davefelmer

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

15:4215:42, 14 November 2024 diff hist −220 4B movement Undid revision 1257319278 by Seefooddiet (talk) The sources do not appear to call it that outright, and I don't see a clear consensus on the talk page, just you telling several people what it should be and why. Tag: Undo
07:2007:20, 14 November 2024 diff hist −220 4B movement Don't see a consensus to include this on talk, it's not directly stated in the linked sources so this seems more like a WP:OR inferring which is WP:UNDUE. Tag: Reverted
07:0807:08, 14 November 2024 diff hist −732 Democratic Party (United States) Doesn't mean much, not discussed in the body. Rv sloppily chopping up the party demographics over one election.
07:0307:03, 14 November 2024 diff hist −5,833 Republican Party (United States) One election doesn't mean we re-write who votes for them in the lead. It's spammy, unencyclopedic and there's literally a note not to change it as it's been discussed many times. Also Reconstruction was a failure and the south voted Democratic before then, just stating it without any context is WP:UNDUE.
06:3306:33, 14 November 2024 diff hist 0 Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts →Summary of 91 district courts: DuBose confirmed by Senate and set to be seated, we've already noted it for Bulsara in same position.

22:0422:04, 13 November 2024 diff hist −9 m Elon Musk Don't know what it'll be, no guarantees it'll be officially established by Congress etc no such body currently exists.

23:1823:18, 10 November 2024 diff hist −41 m 2024 United States presidential election in Arizona Not best known as an attorney across reliable sources. Slight format

15:0015:00, 5 November 2024 diff hist +775 Democratic Party (United States) Not WP:DUE per the body and not better than it was before.
14:5814:58, 5 November 2024 diff hist −1,108 Republican Party (United States) Don't see how this is WP:DUE per the body or better than before.
14:5414:54, 5 November 2024 diff hist −44 m Presidency of Joe Biden already linked above

16:1416:14, 2 November 2024 diff hist −551 2024 United States Senate election in Montana Undid revision 1254886979 by Djflem (talk) The lead is a summary of the article body. This has no prominence in the body, and isn't even in it. Tag: Undo

16:1816:18, 28 October 2024 diff hist −45 Jon Tester Don't need this twice. Tag: Manual revert
16:1716:17, 28 October 2024 diff hist +68 Jon Tester From the body too. Tag: Reverted
16:1516:15, 28 October 2024 diff hist +531 Jon Tester Undid revision 1253051904 by Marquardtika (talk) why not? summarize positions from largest sections and sources are in the body. Tags: Undo Reverted

02:5702:57, 25 October 2024 diff hist +40 Mark Robinson (American politician) Undid revision 1253246624 by Kcmastrpc (talk) This is not at all an accurate summary of the body though. Tag: Undo

20:1020:10, 24 October 2024 diff hist +4 m Inflation Reduction Act No edit summary
19:5619:56, 24 October 2024 diff hist +1,383 Republican Party (United States) format. balance on accomplishments with sources.
19:3119:31, 24 October 2024 diff hist +72 Mark Robinson (American politician) format. this stuff is all over the body in huge sections, summarizing it as 'he made controversial statements and was linked to comments on an internet forum but denied it' is crazy and WP:UNDUE. Don't have to pack the lead with info, but touch on main points from the body. Tag: Reverted
18:1118:11, 24 October 2024 diff hist +422 Lucas Kunce Beef up with background per body.
17:5417:54, 24 October 2024 diff hist −17 Dan Osborn format

12:4612:46, 23 October 2024 diff hist −603 JD Vance They still violate project rules as they are not described anywhere in the article body. The lead is a summary of the body, not a chance to insert unique information even if it's sourced. Furthermore, the article body DOES note that he skipped a senate vote to expand the child tax credit, so to say he supports raising it as a policy position in the lead just because he said so is not WP:NPOV.
00:3400:34, 23 October 2024 diff hist −603 JD Vance WP:UNDUE. These are not discussed in the article body, and some of them directly contradict his actions ie missing a Senate vote to expand the child tax credit a few months ago. Tag: Reverted
00:0700:07, 23 October 2024 diff hist +225 Talk:Dan Osborn →Policy positions
00:0600:06, 23 October 2024 diff hist −93 Dan Osborn Undid revision 1252501870 by DoctorCaligari (talk) Cited in sources in the article body. Tags: Undo Reverted