Rockwell X-30
This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2022) |
X-30 NASP | |
---|---|
General information | |
Type | Single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) spaceplane |
Manufacturer | Rockwell International |
Status | Cancelled in 1993 |
Primary user | NASA |
The Rockwell X-30 was an advanced technology demonstrator project for the National Aero-Space Plane (NASP), part of a United States project to create a single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) spacecraft and passenger spaceliner.[1] Started in 1986, it was cancelled in the early 1990s before a prototype was completed, although much development work in advanced materials and aerospace design was completed. While a goal of a future NASP was a passenger liner (the Orient Express) capable of two-hour flights from Washington to Tokyo,[1] the X-30 was planned for a crew of two and oriented towards testing.[citation needed]
Development
[edit]The NASP concept is thought to have been derived from the "Copper Canyon" project of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), from 1982 to 1985. In his 1986 State of the Union Address, President Ronald Reagan called for "a new Orient Express that could, by the end of the next decade, take off from Dulles Airport, accelerate up to 25 times the speed of sound, attaining low earth orbit or flying to Tokyo within two hours".[1]
Research suggested a maximum speed of Mach 8 for scramjet-based aircraft, as the vehicle would generate heat due to adiabatic compression, which would expend considerable energy. The project showed that much of this energy could be recovered by passing hydrogen over the skin and carrying the heat into the combustion chamber: Mach 20 then seemed possible. The result was a program funded by NASA, and the United States Department of Defense (funding was approximately equally divided among NASA, DARPA, the US Air Force, the Strategic Defense Initiative Office (SDIO) and the US Navy).[2]
In April 1986, McDonnell Douglas, Rockwell International, and General Dynamics were awarded contracts (each no more than $35 M) to develop technology for a hypersonic air-breathing SSTO vehicle/airframe.[2] Rocketdyne and Pratt & Whitney were each awarded contracts of $175 M to develop engines/propulsion.[2] The airframe contractors would compete and two or three would be eliminated after a year.[2] The plan was that 42 months later (end of 1989), contracts would be awarded to build the flight demonstrator vehicle.[2]
In 1990, the companies joined under the direction of Rockwell International to develop the craft, to deal with the technical and budgetary obstacles.[citation needed] Development of the X-30, as it was then designated, began.[citation needed]
Despite progress in the necessary structural and propulsion technology, NASA had substantial problems to solve.[citation needed] The Department of Defense wanted it to carry a crew of two and a small payload. The demands of being a human-rated vehicle, with instrumentation, environmental control systems and safety equipment, made the X-30 larger, heavier, and more expensive than required for a technology demonstrator. The X-30 program was terminated amid budget cuts and technical concerns in 1993.[citation needed]
Legacy
[edit]A more modest hypersonic program culminated in the uncrewed X-43 "Hyper-X".[citation needed]
A detailed, one-third scale (50-foot long) mockup of the X-30 was built by engineering students at Mississippi State University's Raspet Flight Research Laboratory in Starkville, Mississippi.[3][4][5] It is on display at the Aviation Challenge campus of the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama.[6]
Design
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (July 2020) |
The original concept was for a conical nose, this evolved (after 1987?) to a flat shovel shape.[citation needed]
The X-30 configuration integrated engine and fuselage. The shovel-shaped forward fuselage generated a shock wave to compress air before it entered the engine. The aft fuselage formed an integrated nozzle to expand the exhaust. The engine between was a scramjet. At the time,[when?] no scramjet engine was close to operational.[citation needed]
The aerodynamic configuration was an example of a waverider. Most of the lift was generated by the fuselage by compression lift. The "wings" were small fins providing trim and control. This configuration was efficient for high-speed flight, but would have made takeoff, landing and slow-speed flight difficult.[citation needed]
Temperatures on the airframe were expected to be 980 °C (1,800 °F) over a large part of the surface, with maxima of more than 1,650 °C (3,000 °F) on the leading edges and portions of the engine. This required the development of high temperature lightweight materials, including alloys of titanium and aluminum known as gamma and alpha titanium aluminide, advanced carbon/carbon composites, and titanium metal matrix composite (TMC) with silicon carbide fibers. Titanium matrix composites were used by McDonnell Douglas to create a representative fuselage section called "Task D". The Task D test article was four feet high by eight feet wide by eight feet long. A carbon/epoxy cryogenic hydrogen tank was integrated with the fuselage section and the whole assembly, including volatile and combustible hydrogen, was successfully tested with mechanical loads and a temperature of 820 °C (1,500 °F) in 1992, just before program cancellation.[citation needed]
Specifications (X-30 as designed)
[edit]General characteristics
- Length: 160 ft 0 in (48.768 m)
- Wingspan: 74 ft 0 in (22.5552 m)
- Gross weight: 300,000 lb (136,077 kg)
- Powerplant: 1 × scramjet
Performance
- Propellants: air/slush LH2
Design and materials legacy
[edit]This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (July 2020) |
See also
[edit]Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
- NASA X-43 (essentially a scaled-down model)
- Tupolev Tu-2000
- HOTOL – UK spaceplane design of the 1980s
References
[edit]- ^ a b c Chang, Kenneth (October 20, 2014). "25 Years Ago, NASA Envisioned Its Own 'Orient Express'". The New York Times. Retrieved October 21, 2014.
- ^ a b c d e "National Aero-Space Plane Program Fact Sheet". TOTSE. Archived from the original on April 2, 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
- ^ Andersen, Drucella; Baker, Sue; Sandy, Mary (November 4, 1991). "Mississippi State Wins Aero-Space Plane Mockup Competition". NASA. Archived from the original on December 5, 2007. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
- ^ "History: NASP X-30". Raspet Flight Research Laboratory. Archived from the original on March 17, 2005. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
- ^ Andersen, Drucella (June 10, 1992). "X-30 National Aero-Space Plane Mockup Rolls Out". NASA. Archived from the original on September 3, 2009. Retrieved November 2, 2023.
- ^ Visible on Google Maps at 34.709610, -86.642011 ( https://www.google.com/maps/place/34%C2%B042'41.0%22N+86%C2%B039'15.0%22W/@34.7095563,-86.6420974,61m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d34.711389!4d-86.654167?hl=en&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAwOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D )
- Jenkins, Dennis R.; Landis, Tony; Miller, Jay (June 2003). American X-Vehicles: An Inventory—X-1 to X-50 Centennial of Flight Edition (PDF). Monographs in Aerospace History. Vol. 31. Washington, D.C.: NASA Office of External Relations. LCCN 2003051364. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 25, 2020.
- Schweikart, Larry (1998). Hallion, Richard P. (ed.). The Hypersonic Revolution: Case Studies in the History of Hypersonic Technology. Vol. III: The Quest for Orbital Jet: The National Aero-Space Plane Program (1983–1995). Bolling Air Force Base, D.C.: Air Force History and Museums Program. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 2, 2015.
External links
[edit]- 1993 disestablishments in the United States
- Cancelled aircraft projects
- Cancelled space launch vehicles
- Cancelled spacecraft
- Hydrogen-powered aircraft
- Proposed reusable launch systems
- Rockwell aircraft
- Scramjet-powered aircraft
- Single-stage-to-orbit
- Spaceplanes
- Tailless delta-wing aircraft
- Twin-tail aircraft
- Aircraft with retractable tricycle landing gear