Jump to content

User talk:EllenCT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 18:29, 21 September 2015 (Tech News: 2015-39: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please comment on Talk:Economy of Argentina

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Economy of Argentina. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services


Sign up now


Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation (Prince Edward Island). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Americans for Prosperity. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

Please comment on Talk:Supply-side economics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supply-side economics. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Please comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Gender balance

In case you missed it on Jimbo's talk page. User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_185#Gender_balance All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

”Socialism never took root in America”

Probably not authentic [53] Peter Damian (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Damian: Thank you![54] EllenCT (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Google. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

Just checking in

You haven't edited in two days. Let me know if you still want to do this. Serendipodous 17:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

are you planning to do the top 25? Serendipodous 15:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Serendipodous: I've been looking at the exclusion patterns, and I want to take some more time to study them. What can you tell me about articles like Overview effect which get almost entirely mobile views, according to the current WP:TOP5000? Because it was transient, [63] I think it should be ignored. I am not planning to comment on 11-15. EllenCT (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We don't have a lot of info about the all-mobile views, but one in particular, Angelsberg,was due to a bot basically load-testing the mobile Wiki servers. Others are probably spyware botnets checking for internet traffic. Basically, if it gets almost all mobile views, or almost none, you can bet it ain't human doing it. Serendipodous 16:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Top 25 still hasn't been published. It's less than 48 hours until the raw data gets updated. If you're having problems or do not wish to publish the report, let me know so I can do it. Serendipodous 14:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Serendipodous: I don't want to comment on items 11 through 25. I don't see how it serves the readers. I'm disappointed in the exclusion list properties I'm seeing and would prefer to comment on the most edited articles instead of the most popular articles, in general. EllenCT (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wish you'd been clearer earlier; you said "11-15" in your last post. As for exclusions, we've always made it clear that we exclude abnormally low or abnormally high mobile counts. We've been editing this report for years and are pretty solid on the patterns that indicate a false result. If you feel that our research isn't enough, you're free to conduct your own. As to whether it helps the readers or not, well the readers seem to think so; the 25 report gets thousands of views a month. Serendipodous 14:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Please be aware of the sanctions

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to electronic cigarettes.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

QuackGuru (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Conduit (company)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conduit (company). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on electronic cigarette talk page?

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Talk:Electronic cigarette‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war.[76][77] To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. QuackGuru (talk) 03:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)