User talk:TeeTylerToe

Welcome

*Hello TeeTylerToe:* Welcome to the English version of Wikipedia
Thanks to you for your active participation in this project. We hope that you will stay to contribute more and that you will continue to find the collaboration process enjoyable.
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that began in 2001 and is free for anyone to use and edit under certain guidelines and principles that all users should understand and adhere to. These principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information.
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Help. How to get help.
	Tutorial. This tutorial is a basic guide to editing.	Your user pages and your sandbox. How to experiment and edit in your user space.
	Mentoring program. Request help in your first steps of editing.	How to start a page. Help on creating your first article.
	Things to avoid. How to avoid common errors and mistakes.	Style Guide. How to write in an acceptable style.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.

This is your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss things with them. At the end of your messages you should always enter your signature by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing the button in the editor shown here in the picture. By the way, it is not necessary to sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted. My name is DBigXray. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, post `{{helpme\|your question}}` on your talk page (this page), someone will quickly come up and attend to your query. And also, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist. Good Luck Editing!

DBig Xray 08:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on my talkpage

@Eraserhead1 and Memory Geometry article review / help appeal:

Hello!

Your edit at M982 Excalibur was not reverted in bath faith, but because you had not provided references. It is the responsibility of the editor who is adding/changing content to provide reliable references as it is difficult for other editors to confirm that edit. I hope you have learned from that. Happy editing in future. Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 02:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad faith

I would encourage you to read WP:AOBF. Also, I am glad that you acted on my advice and added proper references to the text. Happy editing! Thanks! Anir1uph (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DBig Xray 08:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding reference on wiki articles

Hello TeeTylerToe! Please do not forget to add references for the content you add to Wikipedia. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill as many details as you can,

This will add a well formatted reference that would be helpful in case the website link (web URL) becomes inactive (dead/link rot) after some time. thanks and regards --DBig Xray 08:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

to use this message place {{subst:User:DBigXray/ref}} on User_talk

Talkback

Hello, TeeTylerToe. You have new messages at Anir1uph's talk page.
Message added 09:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Please see WP:BURDEN and please do not WP:AOBF, regards --DBig Xray 09:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citations etc.

I know from the above this this is getting boring but it probably isn't obvious from the above that many editors fighting the endless stream of vandalism have to make quick decisions about edits and make a judgement about whether there is a reasonable chance that they are correct and that references can be found later OR that they are spurious, inaccurate or simply vandalism. An informative edit summary also helps in making that judgement but by far the best is to provide the references with the edit. Accusing others of bad-faith isn't going to endear you to anyone ! Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

MIL-W-46374 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Acrylic, Timex and Luminous

Bridging (networking) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Amalgamation and Router

Arleigh Burke class destroyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to LAMPS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Your recent editing history at Marco Rubio shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to revert you one more time. I've opened up a topic on the material on the article Talk page. Per WP:BRD, please go there to discuss the material so a consensus may be reached as to what the article should include.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Higgs boson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. String Theory¹¹ 18:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflicts

It seems as though you are getting edit conflits. Rather than pasting your entire text into the edit window, check for changes. It appears that this is what is happening, so it appears you are adding vandalism. String Theory¹¹ 18:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:EW

Your edits at Marco Rubio may violate that policy, and you are hereby warned against edit warring. Cheers. Collect (talk) 15:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Marco Rubio shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DBig Xray 15:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]